Device-to-Device Tap Detection for Secure Communication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional keyboard and keypad interfaces in computer and communication devices are cumbersome and inconvenient, and touch screen emulations do not provide significant improvements.

Innovation Solution

A method involving detecting physical contacts between devices, determining if they correspond to taps, initiating a discovery request, and establishing a communication link for data transmission based on tapping patterns, force, location, and duration of contacts, allowing for convenient, safe, and economical device-to-device interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If physical contact detection is used to initiate communication, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases due to sensor integration and tap pattern recognition algorithms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device uses its own sensors (accelerometer, touch sensor) to detect physical contact and automatically initiates communication without requiring manual activation. The system self-determines whether a tap pattern occurred and autonomously starts the discovery phase, eliminating the need for users to navigate menus or press buttons.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operations (keyboard input, button pressing) with automated sensor-based detection. The accelerometer and touch sensor detect physical contact patterns, and the system automatically interprets these signals to initiate communication, substituting mechanical user interaction with electronic sensing and automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If discovery requests are transmitted at limited power levels, then security against unwanted network data is improved, but communication range is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidcommunication range
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The discovery request is transmitted at a limited power level (excessive action for the immediate need) to ensure security by restricting communication to very close proximity. This partial transmission is sufficient because the physical tap already ensures the devices are in direct contact or extremely close, making the reduced range acceptable and secure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The physical contact itself acts as an intermediary that guarantees proximity. Since devices must be physically touched to initiate communication, the need for high transmission power is eliminated - the physical intermediary ensures the receiver is already at the correct location, allowing secure low-power transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If tap patterns are analyzed based on multiple parameters (force, location, duration), then reliability of tap detection is improved, but difficulty of detecting and measuring increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddetection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a multi-functional sensor system where the accelerometer and touch sensor serve multiple purposes: detecting tap occurrence, determining tap pattern, measuring force, and verifying physical contact. This universal approach allows reliable tap detection using existing sensors already present in mobile devices, avoiding the need for specialized single-purpose detectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors sensor data during the tap event and uses feedback from multiple parameters (force, location, duration) to confirm whether a valid tap pattern occurred. The feedback mechanism allows the system to distinguish intentional taps from accidental drops or vibrations by analyzing the consistency of multiple measured parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2430820B1Communication between devices based on device-to-device physical contact
Publication Date: 2014.07.09 SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS AB
  • EP2430820B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1C
  • EP2430820B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2430820B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method includes detecting one or more physical contacts between the device and another device and determining whether the one or more physical contacts correspond to one or more taps. The method further includes initiating a discovery request to the other device, when it is determined that the physical contact corresponds to the one or more taps, and communicating to the other device when a communication link is established between the device and the other device based on the discovery request.