Devolatilizer Shroud Gap Geometry for Polymer Carryover Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing devolatilization designs in solution polyethylene processes experience high polymer carryover into vacuum condensers, leading to fouling and reduced vacuum effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

A devolatilizer design featuring a shroud with a varying gap width and specific velocity profiles to enhance solvent vapor downward velocity, reducing polymer carryover by optimizing the gap geometry and vapor flow rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a heater is used to heat the polymer solution to vaporize solvent, then solvent removal efficiency is improved, but polymer carryover into vacuum condensers increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolvent removal efficiencyVSAvoidpolymer carryover
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The heater surface is segmented into multiple heating zones with different temperature profiles. The first zone operates at lower temperature to gently vaporize solvent, while subsequent zones operate at progressively higher temperatures to complete solvent removal without causing excessive polymer carryover to any single vacuum condenser section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the heater and corresponding vacuum condenser sections are optimized with local quality variations. The heater surface area, temperature, and vacuum condenser cooling capacity are adjusted locally to match the solvent vapor generation rate at each position, preventing polymer carryover while maintaining high solvent removal efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If the heating rate is increased to enhance solvent vaporization, then devolatilization speed is improved, but polymer carryover into vents increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevolatilization speedVSAvoidpolymer carryover into vents
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The heating process uses periodic or pulsed heating cycles rather than continuous high-rate heating. This allows solvent vaporization to occur in controlled bursts, giving the vacuum system time to handle vapor loads and preventing polymer carryover into vents while maintaining high overall devolatilization speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The heating rate is made dynamic rather than static, automatically adjusting the heating power based on real-time monitoring of solvent vapor generation and vacuum system performance. This dynamic control optimizes devolatilization speed while preventing polymer carryover by reducing heating intensity when vapor loads approach condenser capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If a simple heater design is used, then device complexity is reduced, but polymer carryover control capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheater structure simplicityVSAvoidpolymer carryover
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The heater is divided into multiple independent heating zones, each可控 to different temperature levels. This segmentation provides simple yet effective control over solvent vaporization rates at different positions, reducing polymer carryover without requiring complex overall system design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The heater design incorporates self-regulating features where the solvent vaporization process itself provides feedback on heating intensity. As solvent evaporates and the polymer concentration increases, the heating requirement naturally adjusts, providing inherent carryover control without complex external control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively minimizes polymer carryover into vacuum condensers, maintaining vacuum integrity and improving the efficiency of the devolatilization process.

Implementation Method 1

As the polymer flows through the heater and it heats up, the solvent vaporizes and it phase-separates out of the polymer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVaporization: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

the solvent vaporizes and it phase-separates out of the polymer causing foam formation towards the exit of the heater slots into the second devo tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentEP3801802B1Devolatilizer design
Publication Date: 2024.11.27 DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • EP3801802B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3801802B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3801802B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A devolatilizer (devo), which operates at a temperature (T) and at a pressure (P), for the separation of at least a portion of a solvent from a polymer-rich solution comprising the solvent and a polymer, and wherein the devolatilizer comprises at least the following components: A) a distributor, a heater, or a heater/distributor combination; B) a shroud (component B) located around some or all of the periphery of component A; and C) a gap (component C) located between the outer surface of component A and the inner surface of component B.