DevOps Security Quantification Framework

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Implementing DevOps practices is challenging due to conflicting goals between development/operations teams and security teams, as security flaws from automation tools, inadequate access controls, and vulnerabilities slow down software application product development and deployment, requiring a unified approach to address security in DevOps deployments.

Innovation Solution

A framework that quantifies security in DevOps deployments by receiving parameters from multiple stages, generating measurement values, calculating a security score, and identifying security gaps, allowing for early detection and remediation to reduce downtime and failure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If security checks and flaw detection are performed thoroughly, then security reliability is improved, but development and deployment speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity reliabilityVSAvoiddevelopment and deployment speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The framework performs security assessments preliminarily by collecting parameters from multiple sources (automation tools, access controls, code repositories, network configurations) and calculating security scores before deployment issues manifest, enabling proactive remediation that prevents security flaws from blocking development pipelines

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The framework establishes continuous feedback loops where security scores are calculated and compared against thresholds, triggering automated notifications and remediation workflows that provide real-time feedback to development teams, allowing them to address security issues iteratively without halting the entire DevOps pipeline

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If security parameters are monitored continuously across all DevOps stages, then security gap detection capability is improved, but system complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity gap detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The framework segments security monitoring into distinct stages (plan, code, build, test, deploy, operate, monitor) with stage-specific parameter collection, allowing comprehensive security assessment to be broken down into manageable, modular components that can be implemented and maintained independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The framework employs a universal security score calculation mechanism that aggregates diverse parameters from multiple DevOps stages and security dimensions (access controls, code vulnerabilities, network configurations) into a single standardized metric, enabling simplified comparison and threshold-based decision-making across the entire DevOps pipeline

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11722512B2Framework to quantify security in DevOps deployments
Publication Date: 2023.08.08 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US11722512B2 patent drawing
  • US11722512B2 patent drawing
  • US11722512B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for providing a framework that quantifies security in DevOps deployments. The framework includes receiving parameters pertaining to specified factors relevant to security in multiple stages of a DevOps deployment, generating measurement values of the received parameters, calculating a score indicative of an overall level of security in the DevOps deployment based on an aggregation of the measurement values, and, in response to a comparison result of the calculated score against a predetermined threshold, detecting and identifying at least one security gap in the DevOps deployment. In this way, the detection and identification of potential gaps in DevOps security can be made earlier (or “shifted left”), allowing them to be addressed and/or mitigated with reduced DevOps downtime or failure.