DFE and FFE Narrowband Notch Filter for EMI Cancellation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional decision feedback equalization (DFE) systems suffer from error propagation and increased complexity when attempting to cancel electromagnetic interference (EMI) in data communication systems, leading to bursts of errors and higher power usage.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a combination of decision feedback equalization (DFE) and feed-forward equalization (FFE) as a narrowband notch filter, along with fractionally-spaced equalizers and Tomlinson-Harashima precoding, to effectively cancel EMI while mitigating error propagation through filter optimization engines and algorithms like LMS or MMSE.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional decision feedback equalization (DFE) is used to cancel electromagnetic interference (EMI), then EMI cancellation capability is improved, but error propagation and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMI cancellation capabilityVSAvoidequalization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The equalization system is segmented into multiple independent filter banks, each handling specific frequency bands or interference components. This segmentation allows the system to target EMI cancellation in specific bands without requiring complex full-band processing, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining effective EMI cancellation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary processing stage is introduced between the received signal and the final decision output. This intermediary stage includes preprocessing filters and selective equalization paths that simplify the main DFE processing by pre-conditioning the signal, reducing the computational burden and complexity of the core equalization algorithm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If stronger DFE coefficients are used to improve EMI cancellation, then EMI suppression is improved, but error propagation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMI suppression levelVSAvoiderror propagation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different filter coefficients and equalization strengths are applied to different frequency bands or signal components based on local interference characteristics. Rather than using uniformly strong coefficients across all bands, the system applies targeted coefficient adjustments only where EMI is present, achieving effective suppression while minimizing error propagation in clean signal bands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial equalization action by selectively processing only the portions of the signal contaminated by EMI, rather than applying full-strength equalization to the entire signal. This partial action approach achieves sufficient EMI suppression in affected bands while avoiding the excessive processing that would amplify errors in unaffected bands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If longer DFE filter length is used to enhance EMI cancellation, then EMI removal is improved, but implementation complexity and power usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMI removal effectivenessVSAvoidfilter implementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The long filter is segmented into multiple shorter filter banks, each processing specific time delays or frequency ranges. This segmentation achieves the equivalent of a long filter for EMI removal while implementing multiple manageable short filters that are computationally more efficient and easier to optimize individually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than implementing a uniformly long filter across all signal components, the system uses partial filtering action with varying filter lengths adapted to local interference characteristics. Shorter filters are used where minimal EMI is present, while longer effective filtering is applied only where needed, reducing overall implementation complexity and power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12081373B1Decision feedback equalization for electro-magnetic interference cancellation in received signal
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 ETHERNOVIA INC
  • US12081373B1 patent drawing
  • US12081373B1 patent drawing
  • US12081373B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments described herein provide for data communications using decision feedback equalization (DFE) for electro-magnetic interference (EMI) cancellation in a received signal, such as a signal received over a data communication medium and at a receiver of a communication system. In particular, some embodiments use a DFE and a feed-forward equalizer (FFE) to equalize a signal received by a first physical layer device from a second physical layer device over a data communication medium, and to operate as a narrowband notch filter to cancel EMI from the received signal.