Decision Feedback Equalizer With Phase-Opposed Latches For ISI Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Decision feedback equalizers in serial transmission systems face challenges in reducing correction delay and achieving sufficient ISI compensation, particularly due to bandwidth limitations and timing constraints, which can lead to errors in data recovery.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a decision feedback equalizer architecture that includes a multiplexer controlled by a clock signal to generate digital levels for correction coefficients, paired latches in phase opposition for generating bit replicas, and additional latches for cascaded correction, reducing propagation delay and improving sensitivity for accurate ISI deletion across multiple preceding bits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If decision feedback equalization is implemented to compensate for channel degradation, then signal recovery accuracy is improved, but correction delay increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal recovery accuracyVSAvoidcorrection delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The equalization process is divided into multiple stages: linear equalization for initial signal restoration, followed by decision feedback equalization for residual ISI removal. This segmentation allows each stage to optimize for its specific function, with the linear equalizer handling amplitude reduction and the DFE handling timing jitter, thereby improving overall accuracy without excessive delay in any single stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The linear equalizer performs preliminary signal restoration before the DFE stage processes the signal. By pre-compensating for channel effects such as amplitude reduction and initial ISI, the preliminary action reduces the burden on the subsequent DFE stage, allowing faster convergence and reduced correction delay while maintaining high signal recovery accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If linear equalization is used to match the reverse of channel transfer function, then eye aperture is improved, but capability to compensate for high frequency losses is inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeye aperture improvementVSAvoidfrequency loss compensation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines linear equalization and decision feedback equalization into a hybrid equalization system. The linear equalizer component matches the reverse of the channel transfer function to improve eye aperture, while the DFE component provides additional compensation for high frequency losses through feedback-based ISI cancellation, achieving both goals simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The equalization system is designed to perform multiple functions: the linear equalizer handles amplitude reduction and initial ISI compensation, while the DFE stage handles residual ISI and high frequency loss compensation. This multi-functional approach allows the system to address both eye aperture improvement and frequency loss compensation within a single unified architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If DFE corrects incoming bit based on previous bits, then ISI deletion accuracy is improved, but propagation delay increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveISI deletion accuracyVSAvoidpropagation delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The DFE implementation uses a limited number of feedback taps (e.g., 3-5 taps) to correct ISI from previous bits, rather than attempting to compensate for all possible previous bits. This partial action approach achieves sufficient ISI deletion accuracy for practical applications while keeping the propagation delay and computational complexity within acceptable limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8699559B2Decision feedback equalization scheme with minimum correction delay
Publication Date: 2014.04.15 STMICROELECTRONICS SRL
  • US8699559B2 patent drawing
  • US8699559B2 patent drawing
  • US8699559B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A decision feedback equalizer includes a correction circuit to correct a sampled value of an incoming bit based on intersymbol interference of at least one preceding bit, and to generate a received bit. The correction circuit includes a first multiplexer and a first pair of latches coupled thereto. The first multiplexer is controlled by a clock signal to generate a digital level representative of a sign of a first correction coefficient to be subtracted from the sampled value of the incoming bit for deleting the intersymbol interference. The first pair of latches receives as input the received bit and is clocked in phase opposition by the clock signal to generate respective latched replicas of the received bit during respective active phases of the clock signal. The respective latched replicas are input to the first multiplexer.