Characterizing Decision Feedback Equalizer Taps via Iterative Sampling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for characterizing decision feedback equalizer (DFE) taps in memory devices, such as DDR4 and DDR5, are insufficient in distinguishing the behavior of each tap and do not fully exercise the range of tap tuning, leading to incomplete evaluation of DFE functionality.

Innovation Solution

A method involving iterative sampling and comparison of received data with a known correct value, using a digital pattern that maintains a high value for a number of consecutive unit intervals followed by a low value, to characterize each tap by measuring eye height changes as tap values are varied, allowing for the determination of tap step size, linearity, and range without requiring a golden channel or full-speed operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a golden channel is used to test DFE functionality by optimizing taps to zero out inter-symbol interference, then DFE functionality can be indicated, but the characteristics of the taps cannot be fully highlighted and the evaluation is incomplete

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDFE functionality indicationVSAvoidtap characterization completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the tap characterization process by testing each tap independently while holding other taps at fixed values. This allows individual tap characteristics (step size, linearity, range) to be measured separately, resolving the contradiction between indicating overall DFE functionality and characterizing individual tap properties comprehensively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by testing only one tap at a time rather than optimizing all taps simultaneously as in traditional golden channel methods. This partial testing approach enables precise measurement of individual tap characteristics while still providing information about overall DFE functionality through systematic iteration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If traditional golden channel methods are used to test DFE, then functionality can be indicated, but the range of tap tuning is not fully exercised and step size and linearity cannot be determined

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDFE functionality indicationVSAvoidtap tuning range evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamics by systematically varying tap values across their full range during testing. Each tap is tested at multiple different values to determine step size, linearity, and range, thereby fully exercising the tap tuning adaptability while still indicating overall DFE functionality through the systematic evaluation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying tap coefficients through their entire operational range during testing. This allows determination of step size, linearity, and range for each tap, fully exercising the tap tuning parameters while maintaining functionality indication through the structured testing approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If full-speed operation is used for DFE testing, then operational performance can be evaluated, but the characterization of individual tap properties becomes difficult and inter-tap dependencies cannot be studied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational performance evaluationVSAvoidindividual tap property characterization
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the testing process into independent tap evaluations, testing each tap individually while holding others constant. This segmentation allows precise measurement of individual tap properties and study of inter-tap dependencies through systematic reconfiguration, while still enabling operational performance evaluation through comprehensive coverage of all tap combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by establishing a systematic testing framework that characterizes individual tap properties before evaluating full operational performance. This preliminary characterization of step size, linearity, and range for each tap provides a foundation for understanding inter-tap dependencies and facilitates more informed operational performance evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10523473B2Characterization of decision feedback equalizer taps
Publication Date: 2019.12.31 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US10523473B2 patent drawing
  • US10523473B2 patent drawing
  • US10523473B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments, disclosed herein, can include apparatus and methods to characterize taps of a decision feedback equalizer of a data receiver. In characterizing the taps of the decision feedback equalizer of the data receiver, a signal can be transmitted to the data receiver and the received data can be iteratively sampled at an output of the decision feedback equalizer. The sampling can include stepping a sample time relative to arrival of the received data and stepping a reference voltage level to which the received data is compared. Values of the sampled data can be compared with known correct values and such measurements can be used to characterize the taps. Additional apparatus, systems, and methods are disclosed.