DFE Tap Weight Adaptation with Variable Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-speed data links face challenges in achieving optimal signal-to-interference and noise ratios due to limitations in decision feedback equalization (DFE) adaptation methods, particularly in managing tap weights and convergence detection, which affect jitter performance and channel reflection.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a modified zero-forcing least-mean-square (ZF LMS) procedure with coarse and fine resolutions for adapting DFE tap weights, along with programmable convergence detection criteria and a variable-bandwidth updating scheme, is used to optimize tap weight updates and reduce quantization noise, while a floating tap sweeping procedure helps distinguish reflection from noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional DFE adaptation methods are used, then the system is simpler to implement, but the signal-to-interference and noise ratio is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-interference and noise ratioVSAvoidDFE adaptation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the DFE adaptation process into multiple distinct procedures: zero-forcing least-mean-square (ZF LMS) for tap weight adaptation, convergence detection for monitoring adaptation progress, and floating tap sweeping for reflection identification. Each procedure operates with specific resolution levels (coarse and fine), allowing the system to achieve high signal-to-interference and noise ratio through coordinated execution of these modular components without requiring a monolithic complex adaptation mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If fixed update resolution is used for tap weights, then the adaptation process is simpler, but quantization noise increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetap weight adaptation precisionVSAvoidquantization noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic update resolution for tap weights through the ZF LMS procedure, which adaptively adjusts the resolution level based on adaptation progress and error magnitude. The system transitions between coarse and fine resolution levels, allowing high precision updates when needed while reducing quantization noise during stable operation. This dynamic approach enables the adaptation resolution to vary over time and across different tap weights, optimizing the balance between precision and noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If conventional convergence detection is used, then the detection method is simpler, but reflection position acquisition is inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereflection position detection accuracyVSAvoidconvergence detection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces floating tap sweeping as an intermediary procedure between conventional convergence detection and reflection position acquisition. This intermediary mechanism systematically varies floating tap positions to identify reflection locations, using the convergence detection results to guide the sweeping process. The floating taps act as mediators that probe the channel for reflections while the convergence detection monitors overall adaptation progress, together enabling accurate reflection position acquisition without requiring a single complex detection system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Object-generated harmful factors

If variable-bandwidth updating is not used, then the updating process is simpler, but quantization noise is higher

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantization noiseVSAvoidupdating scheme complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements variable-bandwidth updating by dynamically changing the update bandwidth parameter based on adaptation stage and error characteristics. During early adaptation stages or when large errors are detected, the system uses wider bandwidth updating to achieve faster convergence. As adaptation progresses and errors decrease, the update bandwidth is reduced to minimize quantization noise. This parameter change strategy allows the system to optimize between convergence speed and noise reduction without requiring a fundamentally complex updating mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9166832B1Methods and apparatus for decision feedback equalization adaptation
Publication Date: 2015.10.20 ALTERA CORP
  • US9166832B1 patent drawing
  • US9166832B1 patent drawing
  • US9166832B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A receiver circuit includes a feedback filter having multiple taps for receiving a quantized signal and outputting a feedback signal and adaptation circuitry for adapting tap weights of the feedback filter. In one embodiment, the tap weights may be adapted with variable update resolution. In another embodiment, the feedback filter may have fixed and floating taps. Other embodiments relate to methods of equalizing an input signal using a feedback filter. In one embodiment, tap weights of the feedback filter are adapted using adaptation circuitry with variable update resolution. In another embodiment, the adaptation circuitry adapts fixed and floating tap weights of the feedback filter. Other embodiments and features are also disclosed.