Correlated DFIR and LLR Media Defect Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data transfer systems face inaccuracies in defect detection within the transfer medium, which can hinder data recovery and effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

The method involves deriving data inputs from a medium, performing MAP detection to generate NRZ and LLR outputs, correlating these outputs, and comparing the result with a threshold value to assert media defects, with optional delay and filtering to enhance accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If general defect identification approaches are used, then defects can be identified, but detection accuracy is insufficient leading to false positives or missed defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoiddata recovery effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines DFIR (defect-focused intermediate representation) data with LLR (log-likelihood ratio) data to create a correlated defect metric. This merging of multiple data sources improves detection accuracy by cross-validating defect indicators from different processing pathways, reducing false positives while maintaining reliability for data recovery decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses MAP (maximum a posteriori) detection to generate LLR outputs that feed back into the defect detection process. This feedback mechanism refines defect identification by iteratively comparing expected vs. actual signal characteristics, improving both detection precision and the reliability of subsequent data recovery operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If advanced defect detection is implemented, then detection accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the defect detection process into distinct functional blocks: DFIR generation, LLR computation, correlation processing, and threshold comparison. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system manageability, achieving high detection accuracy without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The correlation circuit performs multiple functions simultaneously: it compares DFIR and LLR data, generates defect metrics, and provides inputs for threshold-based decision making. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated circuits for each processing step, controlling system complexity while maintaining advanced detection capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS7849385B2Systems and methods for media defect detection utilizing correlated DFIR and LLR data
Publication Date: 2010.12.07 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US7849385B2 patent drawing
  • US7849385B2 patent drawing
  • US7849385B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides systems and methods for detecting a media defect. A circuit providing a hard output and a soft output is used with the hard output and the soft output being combined and the product compared with a threshold. Based at least in part on the comparison, a media defect may be identified.