Automated Network Node Integration via DHCP Policy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manual integration of network nodes into telecommunications networks is labor-intensive and costly, requiring significant manpower and time, especially during the installation and commissioning phases, which increases operational expenditures (OPEX).

Innovation Solution

An integration apparatus comprising monitoring, identifying, linking, and commissioning manager devices, along with corresponding agent devices, utilizes the DHCP protocol to automate the integration of network nodes into communication networks by detecting activation, allocating addresses, establishing links, and configuring nodes according to policies, thereby reducing manual intervention and enhancing automation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual integration of network nodes is performed, then configuration accuracy and reliability are ensured, but labor intensity and operational expenditure increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration reliabilityVSAvoidintegration efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The network node performs self-configuration by automatically detecting its activation state, identifying itself to the integration apparatus, receiving configuration data, and establishing connections without requiring manual intervention from field personnel

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of field personnel physically configuring network nodes is replaced by an automated electronic system using DHCP protocol for address allocation, policy-based configuration, and automatic link establishment through the integration apparatus

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If manual configuration is performed by field personnel, then configuration accuracy is maintained, but installation time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration accuracyVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Configuration policies and network addresses are prepared and allocated in advance by the integration apparatus before the network node is physically installed, so that when the node is activated, everything is ready for immediate automatic configuration without time-consuming on-site manual setup

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Manual configuration tasks performed by field personnel are replaced by automated electronic communication between the network node and integration apparatus using standard protocols like DHCP, dramatically reducing installation time while maintaining accuracy through systematic automated processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If automated integration using DHCP protocol is implemented, then integration speed and efficiency improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration speedVSAvoidintegration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The integration apparatus uses the universally applicable DHCP protocol to handle multiple integration tasks including address allocation, configuration data delivery, and policy enforcement, allowing a single system to perform diverse functions without requiring separate specialized mechanisms for each task

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The integration apparatus acts as an intermediary between the network node and the rest of the communication network, centralizing the complexity of integration logic in a dedicated device that manages the DHCP-based automated configuration process, thereby simplifying the overall system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If highly qualified field personnel are deployed for installation, then configuration quality is ensured, but operational expenditure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration qualityVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The network node is designed to configure itself automatically through the integration apparatus using DHCP protocol, eliminating the need for highly qualified field personnel to perform manual configuration tasks, thereby reducing operational expenditure while maintaining configuration quality through automated systematic processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The human expertise and manual configuration skills of field personnel are replaced by an automated electronic system that uses standardized DHCP protocol and policy-based configuration, maintaining configuration quality through systematic automated processes while dramatically improving operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8797912B2Integration apparatus, communication network and method for integrating a network node into a communication network
Publication Date: 2014.08.05 NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS OY
  • US8797912B2 patent drawing
  • US8797912B2 patent drawing
  • US8797912B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Exemplary embodiments of integration apparatus, communication network and method for integrating a network node into a communication network can be provided. For example, an integration apparatus for integrating a network node into a communication network may include a monitoring device, a policy device, an identifying manager device, a linking manager device, a commissioning manager device. The monitoring device can be configured to detect activating of the network node within the communication network. The identifying manager device can be configured to identify the activated network node. Furthermore, the identifying manager device may be further configured to receive a policy from the policy device. Such exemplary policy may be configured to facilitate an integration of the identified network node into the communication network. The linking manager device can be configured to establish a link between the network node and at least the integration apparatus. Further, the commissioning manager device can be configured to use the link to configure the network node in accordance with the policy.