DI Chip Access Control with Banned and Member-Only Lists
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current cybersecurity measures rely heavily on user authentication, which is insufficient in preventing cybercriminals from engaging in malicious activities without incurring financial damages.
Innovation Solution
Implementing a punitive cybersecurity system that bans Internet access for identified malicious communication devices, creating and updating a banned Device Identification (DI) list to incur financial damages on cybercriminals, and establishing a DI-Member-Only network for secure access.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If user authentication is used for cybersecurity protection, then access control is improved, but the ability to prevent cybercriminals from engaging in malicious activities without financial damages deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts device identification information from the broader authentication process and creates a dedicated banned DI list specifically for tracking and preventing cybercriminal devices. This separates the function of access control from the function of punitive prevention, allowing each to be optimized independently.
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring device identification information, comparing it against the banned DI list, and updating the list when malicious activities are detected. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to evolving cybercriminal tactics while maintaining consistent prevention standards.
2Object-affected harmful factors
If a banned DI list is created and updated to punish cybercriminals, then financial damage to cybercriminals is improved, but device complexity and system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The banned DI list serves multiple functions: it provides punitive measures against cybercriminals, enables access control for legitimate users, and facilitates cross-device tracking. By making the system multi-functional, the patent reduces the need for separate specialized systems, thereby managing complexity while enhancing effectiveness.
Solution Approach 2:
The system creates a digital copy of device identification information and stores it in the banned DI list. This copying approach allows the system to track and prevent cybercriminal activities without physically interfering with the actual devices, simplifying the implementation of punitive measures while maintaining system manageability.
3Object-affected harmful factors
If device identification information is collected and stored, then prevention of cybercriminal activities is improved, but loss of information and data privacy concerns increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by collecting and storing only the specific device identification information necessary for the banned DI list function, rather than gathering comprehensive user data. This targeted approach minimizes data privacy risks while maintaining the effectiveness of cybercriminal prevention.
Solution Approach 2:
The banned DI list acts as an intermediary between the system and device identification information. Instead of directly storing or processing raw device data, the system uses the pre-processed DI list as a mediator, reducing the complexity of data handling and minimizing privacy risks while maintaining prevention effectiveness.
Data Source
AI summary
A DI (device identification) chip, smartphone, communication device, system, method, or operating method is rendered capable of imposing punitive damages to cybercriminals and cyberterrorisms. Comprised are operating instructions for building a DI database, setting specified DI information required, formatting DI packet, and transmitting the DI packet for verification. The DI database may comprise a banned DI list and/or a DI-Member-Only list. The punitive measure in conjunction with the banned DI list will render a cybercriminal's communication device incapable of gaining access to the Internet, and its operating system invalid, once registered in the banned DI list. Accordingly, for the first time, no cybercriminal/cyberterrorism can proceed with any cybercrime at no cost. Equally unique is the DI-Member-Only list that will allow a central server to be accessible only to the communication devices with the DI information preregistered, thus precluding any potential cyberattack from unknown communication devices also for the first time.