Diagnostic Algorithm Correction via Feedback Loop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical monitoring and processing systems lack an efficient mechanism for updating diagnostic algorithms based on real-time correction indications from healthcare professionals, leading to potential inaccuracies in patient diagnosis.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a monitoring and processing apparatus that senses patient data, a local computing device for generating diagnostic results, and a remote computing device for updating diagnostic algorithms based on correction indications from multiple patients, using a network to disseminate the updated algorithms to other monitoring devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If diagnostic algorithms are updated based on correction indications from multiple patients, then diagnostic accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidalgorithm update mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where correction indications from healthcare professionals are collected and used to update diagnostic algorithms. The remote computing device receives correction indications from multiple local computing devices, processes this feedback, and generates updated diagnostic algorithms that are then distributed back to monitoring devices, creating a continuous improvement loop that enhances diagnostic accuracy while managing system complexity through automated feedback processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

A remote computing device acts as an intermediary between local computing devices and the diagnostic algorithm update process. This intermediary collects correction indications from multiple sources, processes the feedback centrally, and distributes updated algorithms to relevant monitoring devices, thereby simplifying the overall system architecture by centralizing the complex update logic in a dedicated intermediary component rather than distributing complexity across all devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If real-time correction indications are collected and processed, then diagnostic reliability is improved, but data transmission requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic reliabilityVSAvoiddata transmission load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential correction indication data from the feedback process, separating the critical diagnostic correction information from other unnecessary data transmissions. By extracting and transmitting only the relevant correction indications rather than complete patient datasets, the system improves diagnostic reliability through accurate feedback while minimizing data transmission requirements and information loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If updated diagnostic algorithms are distributed to multiple monitoring devices, then overall system accuracy is improved, but network communication requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem diagnostic accuracyVSAvoidnetwork communication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The updated diagnostic algorithms are designed with universal applicability, allowing a single algorithm update to be distributed to and implemented by multiple different types of monitoring devices across the network. This multi-functional approach enables one algorithm to serve multiple devices and purposes, improving overall system accuracy while reducing network communication complexity by avoiding the need for device-specific algorithm variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system enables continuous improvement of diagnostic accuracy by updating diagnostic algorithms based on correction indications, enhancing the reliability of patient monitoring and treatment decisions.

Implementation Method 1

The monitoring and processing apparatus sensor may configured to sense the patient data using one or more electrodes coupled to the monitoring and processing apparatus. The patient data may include an electrocardiograph (ECG) signal.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrocardiograph signal sensing: Electrical Impedance Tomography

Data Source

PatentUS11534067B2Learned monitoring device correction
Publication Date: 2022.12.27 BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD
  • US11534067B2 patent drawing
  • US11534067B2 patent drawing
  • US11534067B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, apparatus, and systems for medical procedures include a monitoring and processing apparatus that includes a memory configured to store a diagnostic algorithm, a sensor configured to sense a patient data of a first patient, a processor configured to generate a first diagnostic result based on the patient data and the diagnostic algorithm. A local computing device is provided and includes a processor configured to receive the first diagnostic result via a first network, receive a first correction indication that includes a correction of the first diagnostic result and transmit the first correction indication via a second network. A remote computing device may be provided and be configured to generate an updated diagnostic algorithm that is updated based on the first correction indication and transmit the updated diagnostic algorithm via the second network.