Diagnostic Model Divergence Analysis for Failure Cause Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional diagnostic and prognostic systems for complex work machines often fail to identify specific causes of failures due to their inability to analyze operation conditions beyond simple classification into normal or abnormal categories, and require significant computational time, making it difficult to predict potential issues effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that uses a computational model to derive output parameters from input parameters, detect divergences, and estimate future trends, while identifying desired statistical distributions to diagnose and predict failures by creating a diagnostic model that reflects interrelationships between input and output parameters, utilizing a zeta statistic to optimize input parameter distributions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional diagnostic techniques classify operation conditions into normal or abnormal categories, then the system can identify failures, but it cannot identify specific causes of failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure identification accuracyVSAvoidcause identification capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the diagnostic process into multiple independent steps: (1) obtaining actual output parameters from the system, (2) independently deriving expected output parameters using a computational model, (3) detecting divergences between actual and derived values, and (4) identifying specific input parameters causing the divergences. This segmentation allows the system to not only detect failures but also pinpoint their specific causes by analyzing which input parameters contribute most to the divergences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If conventional techniques use differences between actual and model values as inputs to generate failure patterns, then failure classification is achieved, but computational time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection capabilityVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential information needed for diagnosis by directly comparing actual output parameters with independently derived values from a computational model. Instead of using all difference values as inputs to generate comprehensive failure patterns, the system extracts specific divergences and traces them back to specific input parameters, significantly reducing computational requirements while maintaining diagnostic reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary computational work by pre-establishing the computational model that represents normal system behavior. This model is used to independently derive expected output parameters in real-time, allowing for rapid comparison with actual values without requiring complex post-processing or extensive computational analysis of failure patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional systems use complex control systems with multiple input parameters, then operational flexibility is improved, but difficulty in identifying specific failure causes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoiddiagnostic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality analysis by examining the contribution of each individual input parameter to the overall system output. When a divergence is detected between actual and derived output parameters, the system analyzes which specific input parameters have the greatest influence on that divergence, allowing for localized diagnosis of specific component failures rather than requiring analysis of the entire complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7499777B2Diagnostic and prognostic method and system
Publication Date: 2009.03.03 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US7499777B2 patent drawing
  • US7499777B2 patent drawing
  • US7499777B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for diagnosing a system is provided. The method may include obtaining a plurality of input parameters from the system. The system may generate actual values of one or more output parameters based on the plurality of input parameters. The method may also include independently deriving values of the one or more output parameters, based on the plurality of input parameters, using a computational model, and detecting a divergence between the derived values and the actual values. Further, the method may include identifying respective desired statistic distributions of the plurality of input parameters, based on the actual values of the one or more output parameters, using the computational model.