Diagnostic Test Order Analysis System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Medical providers may unknowingly order diagnostic tests that differ significantly from their peers, leading to potential inefficiencies or unnecessary tests, without clear feedback on the rationale for these differences.

Innovation Solution

A diagnostic test system and method that identifies a peer group of medical providers based on shared characteristics, analyzes their test orders, and flags any outlier tests through algorithms like support vector machines and artificial intelligence, generating notifications for review and potential adjustment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If medical providers order diagnostic tests based on their own judgment without peer comparison, then they maintain independence in clinical decision-making, but they may unknowingly order outlier tests that differ significantly from peers leading to inefficiencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic efficiencyVSAvoidfeedback on test ordering rationale
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by comparing each medical provider's test orders against peer groups and notifying them of outlier tests. This feedback loop provides information about how their ordering patterns compare to peers, enabling them to adjust their practices to reduce unnecessary tests while maintaining clinical judgment independence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the system notifies medical providers of outlier tests, then it enables correction of inefficient test ordering, but it requires complex algorithms like support vector machines and artificial intelligence to identify peers and outliers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic efficiencyVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses intermediary computational tools (support vector machines, artificial intelligence algorithms) to mediate between raw test ordering data and actionable insights. These intermediaries automatically perform the complex peer comparison and outlier detection, making the system manageable despite its computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If the system establishes peer groups based on like characteristics, then it enables meaningful comparison among providers, but it requires analyzing multiple provider characteristics to form accurate groups

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeer comparison accuracyVSAvoidpeer group establishment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments medical providers into distinct peer groups based on shared characteristics such as specialty, practice setting, and patient population. This segmentation enables meaningful comparisons within homogeneous groups while managing the complexity of inter-provider variations through structured categorization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4073738B1Method of analyzing diagnostic test orders
Publication Date: 2026.04.01 SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC
  • EP4073738B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4073738B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4073738B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method of analyzing diagnostic test orders includes analyzing diagnostic test orders from a plurality of medical providers; identifying a peer group of medical providers having one or more like characteristics from the plurality of medical providers; and determining whether at least one diagnostic test order includes an outlier test. One or more medical providers may be notified of the presence of an outlier test (a test ordered by, or not ordered by, the peer group). Other methods, apparatus, and systems are disclosed.