Diagonal Cutting Insert Layout for Stable Grooving in Tight Spaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cutting tools for grooving operations in limited spaces lack stability and efficient manufacturing, particularly when accessing rotating workpieces, due to inadequate design and clamping mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

An indexable cutting insert with diagonally opposite cutting portions and abutment elements, featuring a central mounting portion and two cutting portions located in diagonally opposite quadrants, with specific abutment and support structures for enhanced stability and efficient clamping, allowing only one cutting portion to be operative at a time, and a cutting tool holder with support elements that apply a clamping force effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If cutting inserts have two cutting portions located in diagonally opposite quadrants for grooving operations in limited space, then accessibility to rotating workpieces is improved, but stability and reliability of the cutting tool deteriorate due to inadequate design

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility to rotating workpiecesVSAvoidstability of cutting tool
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting insert is divided into two separate cutting portions located in diagonally opposite quadrants, with each portion having its own cutting edge. This segmentation allows the insert to access rotating workpieces from different positions while maintaining stability through proper geometric configuration and indexing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting portions are positioned asymmetrically in diagonally opposite quadrants rather than symmetrically adjacent positions. This asymmetric arrangement optimizes accessibility to rotating workpieces while maintaining balance and stability during cutting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Reliability

If complex clamping mechanisms are used to secure cutting inserts, then stability and retention of the insert in the holder is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretention of cutting insertVSAvoidclamping mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The clamping mechanism is merged with the holder structure itself, where the holder integrates both support and clamping functions. This eliminates the need for separate complex clamping devices while maintaining secure retention of the cutting insert through the geometric configuration of support surfaces and clamping elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The holder is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as a support structure and a clamping mechanism. The same structural elements that provide support also perform clamping, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If multiple cutting portions are integrated into a single insert, then productivity and efficiency of grooving operations are improved, but manufacturing precision and difficulty of detecting measuring increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of grooving operationsVSAvoidprecision of cutting portions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The insert is segmented into two independent cutting portions that can be manufactured separately and then precisely positioned during assembly. This segmentation allows each cutting portion to be optimized for specific grooving operations while maintaining overall manufacturing precision through controlled assembly procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting portions are pre-positioned and pre-assembled into the holder with precise geometric relationships established beforehand. This preliminary action ensures manufacturing precision is maintained while enabling multiple cutting operations from a single insert.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3969214B1Indexable cutting insert having two cutting portions located in diagonally opposite quadrants and two lower abutment elements, and cutting tool
Publication Date: 2023.03.29 ISCAR LTD
  • EP3969214B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3969214B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3969214B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

An indexable cutting insert (20, 120) has a central mounting portion (22) and two cutting portions (24a, 24b). The central mounting portion (22) has opposing upper and lower surfaces (26, 126, 28). The lower surface (28) has two abutment elements (36a, 36b) associated therewith, each abutment element (36a, 36b) having two diverging abutment surfaces (38a, 38b; 40a, 40b) forming two abutment angles (ocl, oc2). The two cutting portions (24a, 24b) extend away from the central mounting portion (22), have distal cutting edges (42a, 42b; 142a, 142b), and are entirely located in diagonally opposite imaginary quadrants (Ql, Q3) of four quadrants (Ql, Q2, Q3, Q4) defined by two mutually perpendicular quadrant planes (PQ1, PQ2). Two abutment bisector planes (PB1, PB2) bisecting the two abutment angles (ocl, oc2) and the first quadrant plane (PQ1) are parallel or coincident. In a top view, the two cutting portions (24a, 24b) extend away from the central mounting portion (22) in opposite directions (Dl, D2). Two cutting bisector lines (BL1, BL2) parallel to the two directions (Dl, D2) and bisecting the two cutting edges (42a, 42b; 142a, 142b) are mutually offset. A cutting tool (46) has an insert holder (48) and the cutting insert (20, 120) removably retained therein.