Dialer Application Compliance Enforcement Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In enterprise environments, device administrators face challenges in managing and restricting mobile device usage to prevent costly calls, especially when users exceed allotted minutes or roam internationally, as existing solutions lack effective mechanisms to enforce compliance rules and differentiate between personal and business use.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dialer and messaging application with embedded logic that analyzes compliance rules to enforce restrictions by requiring user confirmation, password input, or compliance with specific policies, such as confirming business use for international calls or roaming charges, and integrating with a management system to manage client devices and enforce enterprise policies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If compliance rules are enforced through user confirmation and password input, then cost control and policy compliance are improved, but device complexity and operational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost controlVSAvoidoperational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring compliance rules, cost thresholds, and policy parameters in the dialer application before calls are made. Users encounter pre-established confirmation prompts and password requirements that are already integrated into the dialing interface, eliminating the need for complex post-call analysis and manual policy enforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The dialer application autonomously monitors call costs, compares them against enterprise policies, and automatically enforces compliance rules without requiring external intervention. The system self-manages cost tracking, policy evaluation, and user authentication workflows, reducing operational overhead while maintaining strict cost control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If dialer application monitors and enforces compliance rules in real-time, then policy compliance is improved, but processing overhead and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy complianceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The compliance monitoring and enforcement functionality is merged directly into the dialer application itself, combining cost monitoring, policy evaluation, user authentication, and call control into a single integrated system. This eliminates the need for separate complex monitoring systems and reduces overall system complexity while ensuring reliable policy compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The dialer application performs multiple functions simultaneously: it serves as the user interface for making calls, monitors call costs in real-time, enforces enterprise compliance rules, authenticates users, and generates cost reports. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized systems and simplifies the overall architecture while maintaining high compliance reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of energy

If the system requires user confirmation and authentication for restricted calls, then cost control is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost controlVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different levels of authentication and confirmation requirements to different call scenarios based on local conditions. Standard calls proceed without additional prompts, while calls to restricted numbers or during high-cost periods trigger specific confirmation dialogs or password requirements. This localized enforcement maintains ease of operation for routine calls while ensuring cost control for restricted usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial authentication by requiring confirmation or password input only for specific restricted call scenarios rather than all calls. This selective enforcement provides sufficient cost control for high-risk situations while minimizing operational friction for normal business calls, achieving an optimal balance between security and usability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10142494B2Enforcement of compliance rules
Publication Date: 2018.11.27 OMNISSA LLC
  • US10142494B2 patent drawing
  • US10142494B2 patent drawing
  • US10142494B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are various embodiments for enforcing restrictions or compliance rules specified by a dialer application or messaging application executed by a client device such as a smartphone. Such a device can be managed by an enterprise and assigned to a particular user. Restrictions can be based on a location of the client device, a network to which the client device is communicating, or other environmental variables.