Peritoneal Dialysis Drain Trending for Incomplete Drain Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (APD) systems often experience incomplete drains due to catheter mispositioning during sleep, leading to residual fluid accumulation and low drain alarms, which can disrupt treatment and result in incomplete fluid usage or patient overfilling.

Innovation Solution

The system adjusts its drain and fill logic to ensure complete drainage by switching to tidal therapy when low flow rates occur, adding cycles if necessary, and uses ultrafiltration (UF) trending to predict and manage intra-peritoneal volume accurately, minimizing alarms and fluid waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If APD systems perform sequential exchanges during the night with patient lying down, then treatment convenience and privacy are improved, but incomplete drains occur due to catheter mispositioning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment convenienceVSAvoiddrain completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by monitoring drain flow rates in real-time and predicting incomplete drains before they occur. The logic implementer calculates expected drain volumes based on fill volumes and ultrafiltration trends, then intervenes by adjusting subsequent fill volumes proactively to compensate for predicted incomplete drains, preventing residual fluid accumulation before it becomes a problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by monitoring actual drain flow rates and comparing them against expected values calculated from fill volumes and ultrafiltration trends. When the system detects that actual drain volume deviates from expected volume (indicating an incomplete drain), it uses this feedback to dynamically adjust subsequent treatment parameters, specifically reducing fill volumes to prevent overfilling and residual accumulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system attempts complete drainage after each dwell, then residual fluid accumulation is reduced, but low drain alarms frequently disrupt treatment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrain completenessVSAvoidtreatment disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by predicting incomplete drains using ultrafiltration trending and expected volume calculations before the actual drain occurs. By anticipating which drains will be incomplete based on historical UF data and current treatment parameters, the system proactively adjusts subsequent fill volumes to account for residual fluid, thereby reducing the need for alarm interruptions while maintaining drain effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides self-service by automatically detecting incomplete drains through flow rate monitoring and expected volume comparisons, then autonomously adjusting subsequent fill volumes without requiring patient intervention or alarm activation. The logic implementer continuously modifies treatment parameters based on detected drain performance, allowing the system to self-correct and prevent residual accumulation without disrupting treatment flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-affected harmful factors

If fill volumes are reduced to prevent overfilling after incomplete drains, then patient overfilling is avoided, but prescribed fluid volume is not fully utilized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient overfillingVSAvoidfluid waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by continuously adapting fill volumes based on real-time detection of drain completeness and historical ultrafiltration trends. Rather than using fixed fill volumes, the logic implementer dynamically adjusts each subsequent fill volume based on the detected performance of previous drains, ensuring that fill volumes are optimized for each specific treatment cycle to prevent both overfilling and fluid waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements parameter changes by modifying fill volume parameters in response to detected drain performance. When incomplete drains are detected, the logic implementer changes the fill volume parameter for subsequent cycles to compensate for residual fluid from previous incomplete drains. This dynamic parameter adjustment ensures that the total prescribed fluid volume is fully utilized while preventing patient overfilling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of substance

If the system adds cycles to use all prescribed fluid, then fluid utilization is improved, but treatment time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid utilizationVSAvoidtreatment duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by flexibly adjusting both fill volumes and cycle durations based on detected drain performance and ultrafiltration trends. Rather than rigidly adding full cycles, the logic implementer dynamically modifies treatment parameters within existing cycles or adds only the necessary portion of cycles needed to utilize the prescribed fluid volume, optimizing treatment duration while ensuring complete fluid utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces low drain alarms and overfilling, ensuring all prescribed fluid is used while maintaining treatment efficacy and patient comfort by adapting to incomplete drains and using UF trending for precise volume management.

Implementation Method 1

uses ultrafiltration (UF) trending to predict and manage intra-peritoneal volume accurately

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrafiltration: Osmosis

Data Source

PatentUS12508354B2Apparatus for trending automated peritoneal dialysis treatments
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 VANTIVE US HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US12508354B2 patent drawing
  • US12508354B2 patent drawing
  • US12508354B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A renal failure therapy system for performing a peritoneal dialysis therapy is disclosed. The renal failure therapy system performs a plurality of peritoneal dialysis cycles for a patient and tracks an amount of dialysis fluid provided by a dialysis fluid pump during the plurality of peritoneal dialysis cycles. The renal failure therapy system also determines, as an initial drain volume, how much dialysis fluid resides in the patient's peritoneal cavity at a start of a next dialysis treatment and determines an initial drain flow for the next dialysis treatment. The renal failure therapy system generates an alert when it is determined from the initial drain flow that a low drain flow or a drain flow stoppage could occur before the initial drain volume is recovered for the start of the next dialysis treatment.