Dictation Review Interface with Visual Correction Indicators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing speech recognition systems in healthcare and other professional settings often generate errors in transcribed notes, requiring review teams to correct these errors, which can be time-consuming and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that provides a reviewing interface for users to review and correct dictation transcripts, with visual indicators showing previously corrected portions, allowing for improved accuracy, speed, and efficiency in the review process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If speech recognition systems are used to generate transcribed notes, then transcription speed is improved, but transcription accuracy deteriorates due to errors in generated notes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranscription speedVSAvoidtranscription accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by displaying visual indicators (e.g., highlights, color codes) that show reviewers which portions of the transcript have been previously corrected. This feedback mechanism allows reviewers to focus their attention on areas that need verification, improving both accuracy and efficiency in the review process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary corrections automatically before human review, using speech recognition to generate an initial transcript with pre-corrections applied. This preliminary action reduces the workload on reviewers and improves overall transcription accuracy by addressing obvious errors before human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If review teams manually correct errors in transcribed notes, then transcription accuracy is improved, but review time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranscription accuracyVSAvoidreview time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and highlights only the portions of the transcript that have been previously corrected, separating these from the rest of the text. This allows reviewers to quickly scan and verify only the corrected portions rather than reviewing the entire transcript, significantly reducing review time while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different visual qualities to different portions of the transcript based on their correction status. Corrected portions are displayed with special formatting (e.g., highlights, color changes) while uncorrected portions remain in standard format, enabling reviewers to efficiently locate and verify only the necessary sections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12300245B1Systems, methods, and storage media for providing presence of modifications in user dictation
Publication Date: 2025.05.13 SUKI AI INC
  • US12300245B1 patent drawing
  • US12300245B1 patent drawing
  • US12300245B1 patent drawing

AI summary

System and method for providing presence of modifications in user dictation are disclosed. Exemplary implementations may: obtain primary audio information representing sound, including speech from a recording user, captured by a client computing platform; perform speech recognition on the primary audio information to generate a textual transcript; effectuate presentation of the transcript to the recording user; receive user input from the recording user; alter, based on the received user input from the recording user, a portion of the transcript to generate an altered transcript; effectuate presentation of the altered transcript in conjunction with audio playback of at least some of the primary audio information in a reviewing interface on a client computing platform; receive user input from the reviewing user; alter, based on the received user input from the reviewing user, portions of the altered transcript to generate a reviewed transcript; and store the reviewed transcript in electronic storage.