Die Bonding Quality Grade Matching for Chip Uniformity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current die bonding methods do not ensure consistent chip quality as they do not consider the quality grade of each die during the bonding process, leading to potential variations in chip performance when dies of different grades are randomly bonded.

Innovation Solution

A die bonding method and apparatus that assess the quality grade of each die, identify specific bonding locations on a substrate based on the die's grade, and bond the die to those locations, ensuring that dies of the same grade are placed in corresponding positions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If dies are randomly bonded to substrate without quality consideration, then bonding process is simple and fast, but chip quality consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip quality consistencyVSAvoidbonding process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by obtaining quality grade information about each die before the bonding process. The controller stores quality information for each die location and uses this pre-acquired data to determine bonding locations, eliminating the need for real-time quality assessment during bonding and maintaining process efficiency while ensuring quality consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by matching specific quality grades of individual dies with corresponding quality levels of bonding locations on the substrate. Different regions of the substrate are designated for different die grades, ensuring that high-quality dies are placed in critical areas while lower-quality dies are placed in less critical areas, thereby maintaining overall chip quality consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If quality information is obtained and processed for each die, then chip quality consistency is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip quality consistencyVSAvoidbonding process time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Quality information about each die is obtained and stored in advance at designated locations on the wafer or in a database before the bonding process begins. This preliminary acquisition of quality data eliminates the need for time-consuming quality checks during the actual bonding operation, as the controller can directly reference pre-stored quality information to determine optimal bonding locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a copy or representation of quality information (such as a quality map or data structure stored in the controller) that mirrors the physical wafer layout. This digital copy allows the controller to quickly query and process quality data without physically inspecting each die during bonding, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining quality consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If dies are sorted by quality grade and bonded to specific locations, then chip performance uniformity is enhanced, but bonding process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip performance uniformityVSAvoidbonding process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by dividing the substrate into multiple bonding locations with different quality levels or requirements. Each die is matched to a bonding location that corresponds to its quality grade, ensuring that high-quality dies are placed in critical performance areas while lower-quality dies are placed in less critical areas. This localized quality matching enhances chip performance uniformity without requiring complete reorganization of the bonding process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from pre-obtained quality information to automatically determine bonding locations. The controller receives quality data about each die, processes this information, and uses it to select appropriate bonding locations on the substrate. This closed-loop approach ensures that quality considerations are systematically integrated into the bonding process without manual intervention, managing complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230028219A1Die bonding method and die bonding apparatus
Publication Date: 2023.01.26 SYSTEM ENGINEERING MEGA SOLUTION CO LTD
  • US20230028219A1 patent drawing
  • US20230028219A1 patent drawing
  • US20230028219A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A die bonding method includes obtaining information about a quality grade of each die of a plurality of dies placed at a wafer, picking up a first die among the plurality of dies from the wafer, identifying a bonding location of a plurality of bonding locations from a substrate according to a quality grade of the first die, and bonding the first die to the bonding location of the substrate.