Die-to-Die I/O Routing on Opposing Surfaces for Better Power Delivery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity and cost of die-to-die routing in integrated circuit components are increased by the use of embedded bridges, leading to reduced power delivery efficiency, process complexity, and yield loss due to heterogeneous chiplets and limited real estate for through-dielectric vias.

Innovation Solution

Die-to-die I/O routing is achieved using opposing surfaces of integrated circuit dies, eliminating the need for embedded bridges and allowing for more through-dielectric vias for power delivery, simplifying the processing flow, and improving yield by integrating homogeneous chiplets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If embedded bridges are used for die-to-die routing, then signal routing between dies is achieved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting structure complexityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the embedded bridge component from the routing structure. Instead of using complex embedded bridges to route signals between dies, the invention uses direct bonding interfaces with redistribution layers on opposing die surfaces, removing the unnecessary intermediate structure and simplifying the overall device complexity while reducing manufacturing cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the traditional routing approach by utilizing opposing die surfaces for signal routing instead of embedding routing structures within a single die. This inversion allows signals to be routed externally between bonded die surfaces, eliminating the need for embedded bridges and reducing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Loss of energy

If embedded bridges are used for routing, then signal routing is enabled, but power delivery efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower delivery efficiencyVSAvoidrouting structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the embedded bridge structure that was impeding power delivery. By eliminating this intermediate structure and enabling direct bonding between dies with opposing surfaces, power can be delivered more efficiently through direct electrical connections without the energy losses associated with complex embedded routing structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If heterogeneous chiplets are used, then design flexibility increases, but yield loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidyield
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal bonding interface using redistribution layers on opposing die surfaces that can accommodate heterogeneous chiplets of different types, sizes, and technologies. This universal interface approach maintains design flexibility while improving yield by enabling standardized bonding processes that are more reliable than previous heterogeneous integration methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Loss of energy

If through-dielectric vias are increased for power delivery, then power delivery efficiency improves, but real estate availability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower delivery efficiencyVSAvoidavailable real estate
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from planar routing within a single die to three-dimensional routing using opposing die surfaces. By utilizing the vertical dimension and bonding interfaces between stacked dies, the invention provides additional space for power delivery structures without consuming valuable real estate on the die surface, thereby improving power delivery efficiency while preserving die area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20250112205A1Die-to-die input/output signal routing utilizing opposing die surfaces in integrated circuit component packaging
Publication Date: 2025.04.03 INTEL CORP
  • US20250112205A1 patent drawing
  • US20250112205A1 patent drawing
  • US20250112205A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Input/output (I/O) routing from one integrated circuit die to other integrated circuit dies in an integrated circuit component comprising heterogeneous and vertically stacked die is made from the top and bottom surfaces of the integrated circuit die to the other dies. Die-to-die I/O routing from the die to laterally adjacent die is made from the top surface of the die via one or more redistribution layers. Die-to-die routing from the die to vertically adjacent die is made via hybrid bonding on the bottom surface of the die. Embedded bridges or chiplets or not used for die-to-die I/O routing, which can free up space for more through-dielectric vias to provide power and ground connections to the die, which can provide for improved power delivery.