Diesel Engine Control via In-Cylinder Condition Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional diesel engine control systems are not sensitive to in-cylinder conditions such as airflow mass, air-fuel ratio, and exhaust gas recirculation rate, leading to suboptimal combustion efficiency and stability.

Innovation Solution

An engine control method that predicts in-cylinder conditions using engine speed, intake manifold pressure, coolant temperature, and oxygen concentration to derive base fueling values and adjust fuel injection timing and quantity, implemented through multi-dimensional lookup tables and functions, allowing for real-time correction based on actual conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional fuel-based control systems are used, then the system is simple to operate, but combustion is not sensitive to in-cylinder conditions such as airflow mass, air-fuel ratio, and EGR rate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion sensitivity to in-cylinder conditionsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors in-cylinder conditions including airflow mass, air-fuel ratio, and EGR rate using sensors, and uses this feedback information to dynamically adjust fuel injection parameters. This closed-loop control enables the system to adapt combustion parameters based on real-time in-cylinder conditions, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity by implementing intelligent feedback mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system predicts in-cylinder conditions in advance using a model that incorporates airflow mass, air-fuel ratio, and EGR rate measurements. This preliminary prediction allows the control system to pre-adjust fuel injection parameters before combustion occurs, enabling proactive optimization of combustion based on predicted in-cylinder conditions rather than reactive adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If fuel injection is adjusted based on airflow mass measurement only, then control is simplified, but combustion optimization is limited to small regions of the operating range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion optimization coverageVSAvoidcontrol parameter quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system transitions from controlling only fuel injection quantity based on airflow mass to adjusting multiple parameters including injection timing, duration, and quantity based on a comprehensive set of in-cylinder conditions. This multi-parameter control approach enables combustion optimization across the entire operating range rather than limited regions, as each parameter can be independently optimized based on its specific impact on combustion characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds new control dimensions beyond airflow mass measurement by incorporating air-fuel ratio and EGR rate as additional control variables. This dimensional expansion transforms the control space from a single-parameter (airflow mass) system to a multi-dimensional control system that can optimize combustion across diverse operating conditions, significantly increasing the coverage of optimized operating regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If fuel-based control is used where throttle pedal position determines fuel injection quantity, then the control method is simple, but combustion efficiency and stability are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion stabilityVSAvoidcontrol system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the simple mechanical throttle-pedal-to-fuel-injection control mechanism with an electronically controlled system that uses sensors, microprocessors, and actuators. This substitution enables sophisticated control algorithms to process multiple in-cylinder condition parameters and dynamically adjust fuel injection parameters, significantly improving combustion stability and efficiency while accepting increased system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system incorporates self-diagnosis and self-adjustment capabilities by continuously monitoring in-cylinder conditions and automatically optimizing fuel injection parameters without external intervention. The system uses built-in sensors and control algorithms to self-regulate combustion parameters, ensuring optimal performance and stability across varying operating conditions while reducing the need for manual adjustment or external control inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in improved combustion stability and efficiency by ensuring fuel injection parameters are adjusted according to real-time in-cylinder conditions, enhancing engine torque and reducing combustion noise and smoke.

Implementation Method 1

For increased power output, most modern diesel engines have a turbocharger, and some have a supercharger to increase intake air volume.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

Use of an aftercooler/intercooler to cool intake air that has been compressed, and thus heated, by the turbocharger increases the density of the air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Implementation Method 3

The fuel ignites from contact with the air, which due to compression has been heated to a temperature of about 1300-1650° F.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression heating: Adiabatic Heating

Implementation Method 4

The resulting combustion causes increased heat and expansion in the cylinder, which increases pressure in the cylinder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS7562649B2Combustion control system based on in-cylinder condition
Publication Date: 2009.07.21 SOUTHWEST RES INST
  • US7562649B2 patent drawing
  • US7562649B2 patent drawing
  • US7562649B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Combustion control of a diesel engine is achieved, such that the engine has a monotonic relation between intake manifold pressure and engine torque. For a given engine speed, fuel injection parameters are primarily determined by intake manifold pressure. However, the determination of the fuel injection parameters is also secondarily based on correction factors such as oxygen concentration, intake manifold temperature, and coolant temperature. In effect, the fuel injection parameters reflect the in-cylinder gas mass.