Diesel Particulate Filter Soot Load Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining diesel particulate filter (DPF) regeneration timing are inaccurate at low exhaust volume flows and during transient conditions due to sensor limitations, leading to potential overheating, reduced fuel economy, and increased component wear.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that combines pressure-based measurements with an estimated soot loading model, using recent accurate readings and operating conditions to continuously monitor particulate filter loading, ensuring more appropriate regeneration timing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If pressure-based measurements are used to monitor soot load, then regeneration timing can be controlled, but measurement accuracy deteriorates at low exhaust volume flows and during transient conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoot load measurement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement reliability under transient/low flow conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary soot load estimation model that mediates between pressure-based measurements and actual soot load. This model uses engine operating parameters (exhaust temperature, oxygen concentration, engine load) to calculate soot generation rates, providing a reliable estimate during transient conditions when pressure sensors are inaccurate. The intermediary model fills the gap between unreliable sensor data and required accurate monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/physical pressure-based measurement system with a computational estimation system during transient conditions. Instead of relying on differential pressure sensors that fail at low flows, the system substitutes a mathematical model that calculates soot load based on engine operating parameters, effectively replacing the unreliable physical measurement mechanism with a computational one.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If regeneration is performed frequently to prevent overheating, then filter safety is improved, but fuel economy deteriorates due to energy consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilter overheating riskVSAvoidfuel economy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism that continuously monitors soot load using both pressure measurements and the estimation model, then adjusts regeneration timing accordingly. The system compares the estimated soot load against threshold values and only triggers regeneration when necessary, creating a closed-loop control system that prevents both overheating and unnecessary regeneration cycles, thereby optimizing fuel economy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary estimation of soot load using the estimation model during transient conditions before determining whether regeneration is needed. This preliminary action allows the system to predict future soot accumulation and plan regeneration timing optimally, avoiding both premature regeneration (wasting energy) and delayed regeneration (risking overheating).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Duration of action of moving object

If pressure-based measurements are used continuously, then monitoring coverage is maintained, but accuracy deteriorates during transient conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous monitoring durationVSAvoidsoot load measurement accuracy during transients
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the monitoring system dynamic by switching between two different monitoring approaches based on operating conditions. During steady-state conditions, the system uses pressure-based measurements; during transient conditions, it switches to the estimation model. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain both continuous monitoring coverage and high accuracy across all operating regimes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the monitoring function into two distinct components: pressure-based measurement for steady-state conditions and estimation model for transient conditions. By segmenting the monitoring task based on operational context, the system can optimize for accuracy during transients without sacrificing continuous monitoring coverage, as each segment excels at its designated operating regime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides more accurate and continuous monitoring of particulate filter loading, reducing the risk of overheating and improving fuel economy by optimizing regeneration timing, even under conditions where pressure-based measurements are inaccurate.

Implementation Method 1

The regeneration may be achieved by raising the temperature of the PF to a predetermined level to oxidize the accumulated particulate matter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

raising the temperature of the PF to a predetermined level

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal heating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS8051645B2Determination of diesel particulate filter load under both transient and steady state drive cycles
Publication Date: 2011.11.08 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US8051645B2 patent drawing
  • US8051645B2 patent drawing
  • US8051645B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for updating the PF soot load of an engine are provided herein. In one example, a soot storage estimate is based on processing operations that occur at different timings. The method can improve soot estimation during some conditions.