Diester Esterification Control for Faster, Lower-Energy Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing batch processes for producing ester-based plasticizers are costly and inefficient, requiring high energy expenditure and facility modifications, making them unsuitable for industrial application.

Innovation Solution

A method for producing diester-based materials by controlling reaction conditions, including temperature and alcohol and inert gas input amounts, to improve reaction rate and reduce energy consumption, optimizing processing conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If batch process is used to produce ester-based plasticizer, then reaction can be simplified and facilities can be reduced, but high costs for adding facilities or changing lines are required and productivity is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefacility complexityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from a static batch process to a dynamic continuous process. The continuous esterification reaction allows for real-time adjustment of reaction conditions and material flow, eliminating the need for complex facility modifications while significantly improving productivity through uninterrupted production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuity of useful action through a continuous reaction process where reactants are continuously fed into the reactor and products are continuously removed. This eliminates the start-stop nature of batch processing, maintaining productive action throughout the operation and thereby increasing productivity without requiring additional facilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Manufacturing precision

If batch process with gas-liquid separation system is used, then non-reactants can be removed efficiently, but energy expenditure is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct purityVSAvoidenergy expenditure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous process maintains continuous removal of water (non-reactant) from the reaction zone, preventing its accumulation and shifting the equilibrium toward product formation. This continuous action achieves high product purity without the energy-intensive batch separation cycles, as the separation occurs continuously during the reaction rather than requiring separate energy-consuming separation steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by adjusting temperature, pressure, and flow rates to optimize the continuous reaction and separation process. By controlling these parameters dynamically, the system achieves efficient separation of non-reactants and high product purity while minimizing energy expenditure compared to conventional batch methods with gas-liquid separation systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If reaction temperature is increased to improve reaction rate, then productivity increases, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction rateVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing temperature, pressure, and residence time to achieve the highest possible reaction rate at the lowest energy cost. The continuous process allows for precise control of these parameters, maintaining the reaction at the optimal point where productivity is maximized while energy consumption is minimized, avoiding the need for excessive temperature increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous reaction process maintains optimal reaction conditions continuously, preventing energy waste associated with heating and cooling cycles in batch processing. By keeping the reaction running at steady state at the optimal temperature, the system achieves high productivity without the energy expenditure required to repeatedly heat and cool the reaction mixture, thereby resolving the contradiction between reaction rate and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method enhances productivity and efficiency while reducing energy costs, achieving a fast reaction rate and high product purity.

Implementation Method 1

obtaining a product mixture including a diester-based material and water by reacting the raw material mixture in the presence of a catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEsterification reaction: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS12606516B2Method for producing diester-based material
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 LG CHEM LTD

AI summary

A method of preparing a raw material mixture by mixing a dicarboxylic acid and a C4-10 mono-alcohol, and obtaining a product mixture including a diester-based material and water by reacting the raw material mixture in the presence of a catalyst. In the first step, at least one among a reactor temperature (Condition A), an alcohol input amount (Condition B), and an inert gas input amount (Condition C) is controlled, and the distinction between a beginning stage of a reaction and an ending stage of the reaction in Conditions A to C above is based on a reaction control point. The reaction control point is a point of time selected at which a conversion rate of the reaction is between 10% and 80%. This method produces a diester-based material with improved reactivity and improved energy expenditure.