Difference Networks for Mass Spectral Ion Assignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mass spectral analysis techniques, such as LC/MS and MS/MS, face challenges in identifying compounds due to the formation of multiple mass spectral ionic species from adducts, polymers, and charge states, leading to false positive identifications and incorrect selection of precursor ions.

Innovation Solution

The use of 'difference networks' to predict charge states, degree of polymerization, and types/number of adducts by calculating differences between mass-to-charge ratios of monoisotopic species, assigning these differences to observed peaks, and correlating groups of related peaks to accurately identify compounds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional mass spectral analysis is used to detect compounds, then detection capability is provided, but false positive identifications occur due to multiple ionic species from adducts, polymers, and charge states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of compound identificationVSAvoidconfusion from multiple ionic species
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex mass spectral data by separating ions based on their m/z ratios and organizing them into difference networks. This segmentation divides the confusing multiple ionic species into distinct groups that can be individually analyzed, allowing accurate identification of compounds while eliminating false positives from adducts, polymers, and charge states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces difference networks as an intermediary computational structure between raw mass spectral data and compound identification. These difference networks serve as a mediator that processes the complex ionic species data, calculating mass differences and organizing ions into meaningful groups, thereby resolving the confusion and enabling reliable compound identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Extent of automation

If automatic data-dependent decision logic is used in MS/MS, then real-time automated decisions are made, but incorrect selection of precursor ions occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated real-time decisionsVSAvoidaccuracy of precursor ion selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary organization of ions into difference networks and calculation of mass differences before the actual precursor ion selection process. This preliminary action creates a structured framework that guides automated decision logic, ensuring that precursor ions are selected based on accurate mass relationship patterns rather than raw, confusing spectral data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the difference network analysis provides continuous information about ion relationships and mass patterns. This feedback guides the automated selection process, allowing the system to adjust precursor ion selection based on the organized structural information from difference networks, thereby improving accuracy while maintaining automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9299547B2Use of mass spectral difference networks for determining charge state, adduction, neutral loss and polymerization
Publication Date: 2016.03.29 THERMO FINNIGAN LLC
  • US9299547B2 patent drawing
  • US9299547B2 patent drawing
  • US9299547B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mass spectrometric analysis method comprises: (1) processing a mass spectrum to reduce the signals to monoisotopic values; (2) creating a list of differences between the monoisotopic values; (3) creating one or more lists of theoretical mass-to-charge differences among known adducts, charge states and polymerization states whose formation may be expected from various analyte molecules; (4) comparing the theoretical differences (line or edge in the network) to the list of differences from the mass spectrum and, where applicable, make and tabulate tentative species assignments; (5) assigning the mass spectral peaks to respective ion species in accordance with the redundancy of each assignment based on multiple independent calculated mass-to-charge differences pertaining to each peak; (6) choosing an ion species for further fragmentation or reaction in the mass spectrometer, based on the assigning; and (7) performing the fragmentation or reaction on the chosen ion species in the mass spectrometer.