Differentiable Battery Selection for Application-Specific Performance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The selection of lithium-ion batteries for specific applications is resource-intensive and time-consuming due to the reliance on heuristic methods and prolonged testing, which does not effectively account for application-dependent performance metrics such as energy, power, and cycle life.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing a continuous latent space representation of battery performance, paired with a differentiable modeling block for direct mapping of performance metrics to specific application scenarios, allowing for efficient selection and potential parameter adjustments of lithium-ion batteries based on autoencoder-derived latent spaces and application profiles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If heuristic methods and prolonged battery testing are used for battery selection, then selection accuracy may be improved, but resource consumption and time requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery selection accuracyVSAvoidbattery selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the battery testing process through simulation. Instead of physically testing batteries in real applications, the system uses computational models to simulate battery performance under various conditions, extracting latent features that predict actual performance without requiring prolonged physical testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis by encoding battery specifications into latent spaces and pre-computing performance predictions before actual application deployment. This allows the most suitable batteries to be identified in advance through computational evaluation rather than through time-consuming sequential testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If heuristic methods are used for battery selection, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but selection accuracy and application-dependency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection process simplicityVSAvoidperformance metric accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional heuristic evaluation methods with a computational modeling system. The differentiable performance model automatically evaluates battery specifications against application requirements using latent space comparisons, substituting manual or rule-based assessment with automated computational analysis that provides both accuracy and systematic evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional battery testing is conducted for multiple application scenarios, then comprehensive performance data is obtained, but resource consumption and testing duration increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication coverageVSAvoidtesting resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal performance evaluation framework that can assess battery suitability for multiple different applications simultaneously. The differentiable performance model takes application-specific parameters as input and can evaluate the same battery against various application scenarios without requiring separate physical testing campaigns for each application type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the evaluation parameters from physical testing conditions to computational latent space representations. By encoding both battery specifications and application requirements into comparable latent features, the system can evaluate performance across multiple applications by varying input parameters rather than conducting separate physical tests for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240069101A1System and Method for Application-Dependent Selection of Batteries with Differentiable Programming
Publication Date: 2024.02.29 CARNEGIE MELLON UNIV
  • US20240069101A1 patent drawing
  • US20240069101A1 patent drawing
  • US20240069101A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a system and method for selecting a battery for a particular application, for example, batteries used in portable electronics, electric vehicles, satellites, etc. The method uses an end-to-end differentiable modeling approach that allows the selection of batteries directly from the parameters of the battery and a specification of the particular application for which the batteries are being selected.