Differentiable Dose Functions for Faster Radiotherapy Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radiotherapy treatment planning is time-consuming and complex, often requiring a trial-and-error process due to the presence of multiple organs at risk (OARs), and existing optimization methods fail to accurately consider dose calculations, leading to inefficient and inaccurate treatment plans.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a machine learning model that estimates radiotherapy treatment plan parameters based on a derivative of dose calculations, incorporating a loss function to optimize treatment plans more efficiently and accurately.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional optimization techniques are used to create treatment plans, then treatment plans can be generated considering clinical and dosimetric objectives, but the process becomes time-consuming and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment plan accuracyVSAvoidplanning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional manual optimization processes with a machine learning model that uses neural networks to predict treatment plan parameters. The system substitutes the mechanical trial-and-error optimization process with an AI-based predictive model that can generate treatment plans much faster while maintaining accuracy through training on clinical outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from traditional optimization parameters to machine learning parameters. Instead of iteratively adjusting treatment parameters to minimize dose to OARs, the system uses a neural network trained on historical data to directly predict optimal treatment parameters, transforming the optimization problem into a prediction problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If manual trial-and-error optimization is used, then treatment plans can be adjusted to meet clinical objectives, but the process becomes complicated by the presence of multiple OARs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanning simplicityVSAvoidoptimization process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the complex manual optimization process with an automated machine learning system. The neural network model automatically handles the complexity of multiple OARs by learning from historical treatment data, eliminating the need for planners to manually navigate through complex optimization scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a machine learning model as an intermediary between the treatment planning problem and the solution. This intermediary absorbs the complexity of multiple OARs and optimization constraints, translating them into a prediction problem that can be solved efficiently without requiring manual intervention in the complex optimization process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If traditional optimization methods are used, then treatment plans can be generated, but they fail to accurately consider dose calculations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedose calculation accuracyVSAvoidplanning efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes traditional dose calculation methods with a machine learning-based approach. The neural network model is trained on accurate dose calculations from historical data, allowing it to predict treatment parameters that directly account for dose distribution accuracy without requiring time-consuming iterative optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary training of the machine learning model on accurately calculated dose data from historical treatments. This preliminary action allows the model to learn the relationship between treatment parameters and dose distributions in advance, enabling fast and accurate treatment plan generation without requiring time-consuming dose calculations during the planning process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12415091B2Radiotherapy treatment plans using differentiable dose functions
Publication Date: 2025.09.16 ELEKTA AB
  • US12415091B2 patent drawing
  • US12415091B2 patent drawing
  • US12415091B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for generating a radiotherapy treatment plan parameter are provided. The techniques include receiving radiotherapy treatment plan information; processing the radiotherapy treatment plan information to estimate one or more radiotherapy treatment plan parameters based on a process that depends on the output of a subprocess that estimates a derivative of a dose calculation; and generating a radiotherapy treatment plan using the estimated one or more radiotherapy treatment plan parameters.