Differentiable Digital Signal Processor for Efficient Audio Synthesis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current digital signal processing (DSP) tools face challenges in versatility and efficiency due to the need for manual parameter selection and extensive training, especially when dealing with oscillating signals, leading to unnatural signal artifacts and high computational costs.

Innovation Solution

The integration of differentiable digital signal processors (DDSP) into machine-learned models allows for gradient-based training, leveraging the inductive bias of DSP elements towards oscillating signals, reducing the need for extensive training data and enabling efficient processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional DSP tools are used with manual parameter selection, then processing accuracy can be maintained, but the time and labor required for development increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing accuracyVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual parameter selection (mechanical process) with machine learning models that automatically learn optimal parameters from data. The system uses neural networks to predict DSP parameters without human intervention, substituting the manual tuning process with an automated intelligent system that learns from training data and applies learned patterns to new signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The DSP system performs self-configuration through machine learning models that automatically select and adjust parameters based on input signal characteristics. The system serves itself by using trained models to make parameter decisions without external human input, enabling autonomous adaptation to different signal types and conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If machine-learned models replace traditional DSP elements, then training requirements increase significantly, but the models can learn optimal parameters automatically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimizationVSAvoidtraining data
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-training machine learning models on extensive datasets before deployment. The models are trained offline on large collections of labeled signal data to learn optimal parameter mappings, so that when deployed, they can automatically generalize to new signals without requiring additional training data at runtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by using machine learning models that output DSP parameters as predictions. The models learn to map input signal features to optimal parameter values, dynamically adjusting parameters based on learned patterns rather than using fixed or manually set values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If extensive training is performed to achieve good performance, then model accuracy improves, but computational costs and energy usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using simplified machine learning models that achieve sufficient performance without exhaustive training. Rather than training models to maximum possible accuracy, the system uses models trained to a practical threshold that provides adequate performance while significantly reducing training computational requirements and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses lightweight, computationally efficient models that can be quickly trained and deployed on resource-constrained devices. These models are designed to be simple enough to train with limited computational resources and run efficiently during inference, sacrificing some complexity for gains in energy efficiency and deployability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentUS20240395277A1Machine-Learned Differentiable Digital Signal Processing
Publication Date: 2024.11.28 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20240395277A1 patent drawing
  • US20240395277A1 patent drawing
  • US20240395277A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods of the present disclosure are directed toward digital signal processing using machine-learned differentiable digital signal processors. For example, embodiments of the present disclosure may include differentiable digital signal processors within the training loop of a machine-learned model (e.g., for gradient-based training). Advantageously, systems and methods of the present disclosure provide high quality signal processing using smaller models than prior systems, thereby reducing energy costs (e.g., storage and/or processing costs) associated with performing digital signal processing.