Differentiable Graph Cuts for Efficient ANN Explainability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Neural networks used in video processing, such as image-based tasks, are computationally intensive, leading to significant time and energy consumption, and existing methods for solving graph cut problems in these networks are inefficient and non-differentiable, especially when dealing with large numbers of variables and constraints.

Innovation Solution

The use of regularized equality constrained quadratic processes to solve graph cut problems, combined with pre-computed Karush-Kuhn-Tucker matrix factorizations, allows for efficient and differentiable solutions, reducing computational burden and memory usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional graph cut methods are used in neural networks for video processing, then image segmentation and object detection can be performed, but computational intensity increases significantly leading to higher time and energy consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage segmentation efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the graph cut problem into a quadratic programming problem with equality constraints, changing the mathematical formulation parameters to enable differentiable optimization. This allows the system to solve graph cuts more efficiently using standard neural network optimization techniques, reducing computational intensity and energy consumption while maintaining segmentation accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces non-differentiable conventional graph cut solvers with a differentiable quadratic programming formulation. This substitution enables the use of gradient-based optimization methods inherent in neural networks, eliminating the need for separate optimization passes and reducing overall computational burden

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If existing graph cut solvers are used, then graph partitioning can be achieved, but the methods are non-differentiable and inefficient when dealing with large numbers of variables and constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescalability to large variablesVSAvoidsolver complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reformulates the graph cut problem as a quadratic programming problem with equality constraints, changing the mathematical parameters to be differentiable with respect to neural network weights. This allows standard backpropagation to be used for optimization, making the system scalable to large numbers of variables and constraints without increasing solver complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The differentiable quadratic programming formulation serves multiple functions: it solves graph cuts, provides gradients for neural network training, and scales to large problems. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate differentiation steps and optimizers, reducing overall system complexity while improving scalability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If full input processing is performed in neural networks, then accurate predictions can be generated, but time and energy consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the input by solving graph cuts that partition the input space into meaningful regions. This segmentation allows the neural network to process only relevant portions of the input more efficiently, maintaining prediction accuracy while reducing processing time through targeted computation on segmented regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The graph cut solution acts as an intermediary that bridges the input data and neural network processing. By introducing graph-based segmentation as an intermediate step, the system can pre-organize input data into meaningful structures that reduce subsequent processing requirements while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260051148A1Graph cuts for explainability
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 QUALCOMM TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20260051148A1 patent drawing
  • US20260051148A1 patent drawing
  • US20260051148A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A processor-implemented method for implementing graph cuts for explainability using an artificial neural network (ANN) includes receiving, via the ANN, an input. The input is represented as a graph. The graph includes nodes connected by edges. The ANN determines a graph cut between a source node and a sink node associated with the input by solving a quadratic process with equality constraints. The ANN processes a subset of the input based on the graph cut to generate a prediction.