Differentiable Machine Modeling for Complex Physical System Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Complex physical systems are difficult to model and control due to their intricate interactions, leading to challenges in debugging and troubleshooting, as existing simulation methods are limited by computational costs and require extensive data for training, and generic machine learning models may not accurately represent real-world behavior.

Innovation Solution

The development of differentiable machines, which comprise multiple differentiable models representing components of a physical system, integrated using a layer to form a comprehensive differentiable machine that can be trained and tuned based on actual experimental outputs, allowing for efficient end-to-end modeling and control of physical systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional simulation methods are used to model complex physical systems, then modeling accuracy can be maintained, but computational costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling accuracyVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the physical system into multiple differentiable components or modules, each representing a specific physical subsystem. This segmentation allows the complex system to be modeled through composition of simpler differentiable functions, maintaining accuracy while reducing overall computational burden through modular evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional numerical simulation methods with differentiable programming approaches. By formulating physical laws as differentiable equations that can be solved through gradient-based optimization, the system achieves accurate modeling without the high computational costs associated with traditional physics engines and numerical solvers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If generic machine learning models are used to represent physical systems, then computational efficiency improves, but accuracy in representing real-world behavior deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidbehavior representation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters and structure of the modeling approach by using differentiable programming with explicit physical constraints. Instead of generic neural networks with learned parameters, the system uses differentiable equations where parameters have direct physical meanings and are constrained by known physical laws, ensuring both efficiency and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces differentiable programming as an intermediary between generic machine learning and traditional physics simulation. This intermediary layer allows the system to incorporate physical knowledge and constraints into the modeling process while maintaining the computational efficiency needed for practical applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of repair

If detailed models of complex physical systems are created, then debugging and troubleshooting capability improves, but model complexity increases making the system harder to manage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebugging capabilityVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the physical system into modular differentiable components, where each module represents a specific subsystem. This segmentation enables independent debugging and troubleshooting of individual components without affecting the entire system, reducing the complexity burden while maintaining detailed modeling capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The differentiable nature of the models enables automatic feedback through gradient computation. This allows the system to automatically identify which components or parameters contribute most to modeling errors, facilitating targeted debugging and troubleshooting without manually analyzing the entire complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20220171353A1Differentiable machines for physical systems
Publication Date: 2022.06.02 DEEP FOREST SCIENCES INC
  • US20220171353A1 patent drawing
  • US20220171353A1 patent drawing
  • US20220171353A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses, systems, computer program products, and methods are disclosed for differentiable machines for physical systems. A hardware server device is configured to determine a plurality of differentiable models each representing a component of a physical system. A hardware server device is configured to combine a plurality of differentiable models using an integration layer so that the integration layer and the combined differentiable models form a differentiable machine representing a physical system. A hardware server device is configured to deploy a differentiable machine for an instance of a physical system.