Differentiable Procedural Material Generation Pipeline

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional procedural material generation systems are inflexible and require expert knowledge, making them time-consuming and limited in generating a wide range of materials, often necessitating the use of memory-intensive full rendering instead of compact procedural versions.

Innovation Solution

An end-to-end differentiable pipeline that adapts procedural material parameters using a gradient-based optimization scheme, allowing for the flexible generation of procedural materials by comparing and optimizing parameters based on a target physical material's image.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional procedural material generation systems are used, then the system structure is relatively simple, but the flexibility and ease of operation deteriorate due to requiring expert knowledge and being time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a neural network as an intermediary component that automatically generates procedural material node graphs from input images. This neural network mediator translates image data into procedural material parameters, eliminating the need for users to manually configure complex node graphs while maintaining high flexibility in material generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service operation by allowing users to simply provide an input image without needing expert knowledge of procedural material generation. The automated pipeline handles the complex tasks of node graph generation, parameter optimization, and material synthesis, making the system accessible to non-experts while maintaining professional-quality output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If conventional procedural material generation systems are used, then the system is relatively simple, but productivity deteriorates due to being time-consuming and limited in generating a wide range of materials

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous optimization through iterative refinement processes where the generated procedural material is repeatedly evaluated and adjusted. The system continuously refines node graph parameters and material properties until optimal results are achieved, significantly improving productivity compared to single-pass conventional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes of material generation with automated neural network-based systems. Instead of requiring experts to manually construct and adjust procedural materials, the system uses machine learning models to automatically generate and optimize materials, dramatically increasing productivity and the range of generatable materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If conventional systems are used, then the system structure is simple, but measurement precision deteriorates due to inability to accurately reflect target physical materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the generated procedural material is continuously compared against target physical material characteristics. The system uses this feedback to iteratively adjust and optimize the node graph parameters, ensuring high measurement precision in accurately capturing the essential properties of target materials while managing complexity through structured optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12198231B2Generating differentiable procedural materials
Publication Date: 2025.01.14 ADOBE INC
  • US12198231B2 patent drawing
  • US12198231B2 patent drawing
  • US12198231B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to using end-to-end differentiable pipeline for optimizing parameters of a base procedural material to generate a procedural material corresponding to a target physical material. For example, the disclosed systems can receive a digital image of a target physical material. In response, the disclosed systems can retrieve a differentiable procedural material for use as a base procedural material in response. The disclosed systems can compare a digital image of the base procedural material with the digital image of the target physical material using a loss function, such as a style loss function that compares visual appearance. Based on the determined loss, the disclosed systems can modify the parameters of the base procedural material to determine procedural material parameters for the target physical material. The disclosed systems can generate a procedural material corresponding to the base procedural material using the determined procedural material parameters.