Differentiable Ranking Graph Sparsification for Noise Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large graphs in real-life applications pose challenges due to overfitting risks and visualization difficulties, necessitating effective graph sparsification methods that can reduce noise and improve scalability.

Innovation Solution

Differentiable Ranking based Graph Sparsification (DRGS) utilizes supervision signals from downstream tasks to guide graph sparsification by generating node representations and sampling top-k important neighbors from a learned neighborhood ranking distribution, making sparsified graphs differentiable for efficient computation and decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If graph sparsification is applied to reduce noise and improve scalability, then the quality of predictions and classifications may deteriorate due to loss of information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidinformation loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter representation from discrete graph structures to continuous probability distributions. By representing neighbor selection as a differentiable probability distribution rather than fixed discrete choices, the system enables gradient-based optimization that adapts the sparsification parameters to minimize information loss while maintaining computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical graph sparsification process with a differentiable ranking mechanism. Instead of using fixed algorithms to select neighbors, the system employs a neural network-based ranking function that can be differentiated and optimized through backpropagation, allowing the sparsification process to learn optimal information preservation strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If traditional graph sparsification methods are used, then computation becomes faster, but the method cannot adapt to different downstream tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputation speedVSAvoidtask adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic adaptability by making the sparsification process task-dependent. The differentiable ranking function learns task-specific importance weights through gradient descent, allowing the same graph structure to be sparsified differently for different downstream tasks such as classification, regression, or link prediction, thereby achieving both speed and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback loops where the performance on downstream tasks is used to update the sparsification parameters. Through backpropagation, the system receives feedback from task performance and adjusts the neighbor selection probabilities to optimize both computational efficiency and task-specific accuracy, creating an adaptive system that improves with use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11645540B2Deep graph de-noise by differentiable ranking
Publication Date: 2023.05.09 NEC CORP
  • US11645540B2 patent drawing
  • US11645540B2 patent drawing
  • US11645540B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for employing a differentiable ranking based graph sparsification (DRGS) network to use supervision signals from downstream tasks to guide graph sparsification is presented. The method includes, in a training phase, generating node representations by neighborhood aggregation operators, generating sparsified subgraphs by top-k neighbor sampling from a learned neighborhood ranking distribution, feeding the sparsified subgraphs to a task, generating a prediction, and collecting a prediction error to update parameters in the generating and feeding steps to minimize an error, and, in a testing phase, generating node representations by neighborhood aggregation operators related to testing data, generating sparsified subgraphs by top-k neighbor sampling from a learned neighborhood ranking distribution related to the testing data, feeding the sparsified subgraphs related to the testing data to a task, and outputting prediction results to a visualization device.