Differential Amplifier Feedback Loops for Stable Common-Mode Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fully differential amplifiers require stable common-mode feedback to operate effectively but often suffer from instability and high current consumption due to high impedance at the output terminal.

Innovation Solution

A differential amplifier circuit is designed with a first feedback loop to decrease output node impedance and increase phase margin, and a second feedback loop to control current mirror currents, reducing overall current consumption while maintaining stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a common-mode feedback operation is implemented to ensure stable operation of the fully differential amplifier, then the operational stability is improved, but the current consumption increases due to high impedance at the output terminal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational stabilityVSAvoidcurrent consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback system is segmented into two independent loops: a first feedback loop for common-mode signal stabilization and a second feedback loop for differential signal amplification. This segmentation allows each loop to be optimized independently, enabling stable operation with reduced current consumption by avoiding the need for high impedance in the common-mode feedback path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A buffer circuit is introduced as an intermediary between the common-mode feedback path and the output node. The buffer provides impedance transformation, allowing the common-mode feedback to operate at low impedance while maintaining stable common-mode voltage control, thereby reducing current consumption without sacrificing stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the output node impedance is increased to improve common-mode feedback performance, then the common-mode control accuracy is improved, but the phase margin decreases causing instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommon-mode control accuracyVSAvoidphase margin
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback system is divided into separate common-mode and differential-mode loops. The first feedback loop handles common-mode control with optimized impedance characteristics, while the second loop handles differential amplification. This segmentation allows the common-mode loop to achieve high control accuracy without negatively impacting the phase margin of the differential loop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The impedance parameters of the feedback paths are independently optimized for their respective functions. The common-mode feedback path uses impedance values optimized for control accuracy, while the differential path maintains impedance characteristics that ensure adequate phase margin and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a single feedback loop is used for common-mode feedback, then the circuit complexity is reduced, but the current consumption increases and stability is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback loop structureVSAvoidcurrent consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback system is segmented into two independent loops with distinct functions: common-mode feedback and differential amplification. This segmentation, while increasing structural complexity, enables both loops to operate with optimized parameters that reduce current consumption and improve stability compared to a single unified feedback loop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The buffer circuit serves multiple functions: it provides impedance transformation for the common-mode feedback, acts as a signal buffer between stages, and contributes to overall circuit stability. This multi-functionality justifies the additional circuit elements by providing multiple benefits beyond simple signal transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250105810A1Differential amplifier including feedback loop circuits, electronic device, and operating method thereof
Publication Date: 2025.03.27 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20250105810A1 patent drawing
  • US20250105810A1 patent drawing
  • US20250105810A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a differential amplifier forming a first feedback loop and a second feedback loop by including feedback loop circuits, an electronic device, and an operating method thereof. The differential amplifier configured to generate at least one pair of differential output signals by amplifying at least one pair of differential input signals and to generate an output common-mode signal based on the at least one pair of differential output signals. The main amplifier includes a first current mirror that generates first currents. A first feedback loop circuit is connected to an output node of the main amplifier which outputs the output common-mode signal, and forms a first feedback loop that feeds back the output common-mode signal. A second feedback loop circuit generates a control signal that controls the first currents based on the output common-mode signal, and forms a second feedback loop.