Differential NMOS Amplifier Topology for Wideband Noise Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication receivers, particularly those for fifth-generation networks, require high-frequency operation with low noise and low power consumption, which existing amplifiers fail to achieve effectively due to limitations in noise cancellation and bandwidth.

Innovation Solution

A noise-suppressing amplifier design utilizing a differential pair configuration with NMOS transistors, where transconductance ratios between transistors enable independent noise cancellation, allowing for flexible design, wide bandwidth, and low power consumption, by summing currents from specific transistor configurations to achieve balanced noise suppression.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a conventional LNA configuration is used, then the amplifier can provide basic amplification, but noise cancellation performance is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovenoiseVSAvoidnoise cancellation performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The amplifier is divided into multiple transistor segments (first, second, third, and fourth NMOS transistors) with distinct functions. The first and fourth transistors handle signal amplification while the second and third transistors are dedicated to noise cancellation, allowing independent optimization of each segment's transconductance to achieve both low noise and high reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different transconductance characteristics are assigned to different transistor segments based on their specific functions. The second and third transistors have higher transconductance optimized for noise cancellation, while the first and fourth transistors have transconductance optimized for signal amplification, allowing each local segment to have optimal properties for its intended purpose

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If noise cancellation techniques are implemented, then noise suppression improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovenoiseVSAvoidamplifier structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The noise cancellation function is merged with the signal amplification function in a unified differential amplifier structure. The second and third transistors are integrated into the same differential pair as the first and fourth transistors, sharing common circuit elements and topology, which reduces overall device complexity compared to separate noise cancellation circuits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The differential amplifier structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: signal amplification through the first and fourth transistors, noise cancellation through the second and third transistors, and impedance matching at the input. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated circuits, thereby reducing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If transconductance ratios are optimized for noise cancellation, then noise suppression improves, but bandwidth may be limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovenoiseVSAvoidbandwidth
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The amplifier design allows for dynamic optimization of transconductance ratios within the differential pair structure. By carefully selecting the transconductance values of individual transistors while maintaining overall differential symmetry, the circuit achieves optimal noise cancellation across a wide frequency range, preventing bandwidth limitation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Speed

If high-frequency operation is implemented, then communication capacity increases, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating frequencyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The amplifier operates by optimizing transistor transconductance parameters rather than increasing operating voltage or current. By achieving noise cancellation and signal amplification through careful parameter selection of the NMOS transistors, the circuit maintains high-frequency operation capability while avoiding the power consumption increase that would result from higher voltage or current levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3272007B1Amplifier adapted for noise suppression
Publication Date: 2022.07.06 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • EP3272007B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3272007B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3272007B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An amplifier (100) adapted for noise suppression comprises a first input (102) for receiving a first input signal and a second input (104) for receiving a second input signal, the first and second input signals constituting a differential pair. A first output (106) delivers a first output signal and a second output (108) delivers a second output signal, the first and second output signals constituting a differential pair. A first transistor (MCG1) has a first drain (110) coupled to the first output (106) such that all signal current, except parasitic losses, flowing through the first drain (110) flows through the first output (106), and the first transistor (MCG1) further having a first source (112) coupled to the first input (102). A second transistor (MCs1) has a second gate (116) coupled to the first input (102), a second drain (118) coupled to the second output (108) such that all signal current, except parasitic losses, flowing through the second drain (118) flows through the second output (108), and the second transistor (MCs1) further having a second source (120) coupled to a first voltage rail (122). A third transistor (MCs2) has a third gate (124) coupled to the second input (104), a third drain (126) coupled to the first output (106) such that all signal current, except parasitic losses, flowing through the third drain (126) flows through the first output (106), and the third transistor (MCs2) further having a third source (128) coupled to the first voltage rail (122). A fourth transistor (MCG2) has a fourth drain (130) coupled to the second output (108) such that all signal current, except parasitic losses, flowing through the fourth drain (130) flows through the second output (108), and the fourth transistor (MCG2) further having a fourth source (132) coupled to the second input (104). A first load (ZL1) is coupled between the first output (106) and a second voltage rail (136). A second load (ZL2) is coupled between the second output (108) and the second voltage rail (136). A first inductive element (L1) is coupled between the first input (102) and a third voltage rail (138), and a second inductive element (L2) is coupled between the second input (104) and the third voltage rail (138). Transconductance of the first transistor (MCG1) is substantially equal to transconductance of the fourth transistor (MCG2), within ±5%, and transconductance of the second transistor (MCs1) is substantially equal to transconductance of the third transistor (MCs2), within ±5%.