Differential Class-D Amplifier Duty Compensation for Output Power

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Class-D amplifiers face challenges in resisting common mode voltage variations and compensating for output power loss due to non-ideal factors such as resistance in driving circuits, which degrades signal quality and output power, especially in applications with limited layout areas like portable AV electronics.

Innovation Solution

A class-D amplifier design incorporating a block structure with input circuits, integrators, comparators, driving circuits, and feedback circuits that utilize differential signaling and compensation circuits to resist common mode voltage variations and compensate for output power loss by adjusting feedback signals and duty cycles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If class-D amplifier is integrated into control/processing chip of portable AV electronics, then layout area is reduced, but output power and signal quality deteriorate due to non-ideal factors such as resistance of driving circuits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout areaVSAvoidoutput power
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the driving output signal is fed back to the integrator through feedback circuits. This feedback loop enables the system to detect and compensate for power losses caused by non-ideal factors such as driving circuit resistance, thereby maintaining high output power even when integrated into a compact chip layout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs duty cycle adjustment as a parameter change mechanism. By dynamically modifying the duty cycle of the PWM signal based on feedback information, the system compensates for power losses and maintains optimal output power performance within the constrained layout area of portable devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Area of stationary object

If class-D amplifier is integrated into control/processing chip of portable AV electronics, then layout area is reduced, but signal quality deteriorates due to common mode voltage variation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout areaVSAvoidsignal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback circuits transmit the driving output signal back to the integrator, enabling real-time detection of common mode voltage variations. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adjust and compensate for signal quality degradation, maintaining reliable performance in the integrated compact design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The integrator serves as an intermediary element that processes the feedback signal and adjusts the control signal accordingly. This intermediary mechanism helps isolate and compensate for common mode voltage variations, protecting signal quality from degradation due to integration constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Power

If feedback compensation of duty is implemented, then output power loss is compensated, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput powerVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The integrator performs multiple functions: it integrates the difference between input and feedback signals, generates control signals for the driving circuit, and simultaneously processes feedback for duty cycle compensation. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate compensation circuits, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity while achieving output power compensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If differential pair signaling is used, then common mode voltage variation resistance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to common mode voltage variationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The differential pair structure is integrated into the existing integrator and comparator circuits, allowing these components to simultaneously handle differential signaling and common mode rejection without requiring entirely separate circuitry. This approach improves resistance to common mode voltage variation while minimizing the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8138832B2Class-D amplifier
Publication Date: 2012.03.20 FARADAY TECH CORP
  • US8138832B2 patent drawing
  • US8138832B2 patent drawing
  • US8138832B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Class D amplifier is provided. The class D amplifier includes at least a block; each block includes an input circuit, an integrator, a comparator, a driving circuit and two feedback circuits. The input circuit receives a digital input to provide a differential pair of a positive and a negative input signals. The integrator receives the positive and negative input signals and a pair of positive and negative feedback signals for providing a positive error signal according to the positive input signal and the negative feedback signal, and providing a negative error signal according to the negative input signal and the positive feedback signal. The comparator compares between the positive and the negative error signals such that the driving circuit generates a driving output signal according to comparison result. The two feedback circuits respectively providing said positive and negative feedback signals according to the driving output signal.