Differential Colpitts Oscillator for Wide Tuning at Low Phase Noise

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing Colpitts oscillators face challenges in extending tuning range without compromising phase noise performance, area, or power consumption, and maintaining positive feedback voltage during frequency tuning.

Innovation Solution

A differential Colpitts oscillator circuit design featuring center-tap points for inductors and a capacitive ladder structure, which reduces the minimum power supply voltage and bias voltage, allowing for extended tuning range and reduced phase noise while maintaining positive feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the oscillation frequency is tuned by adjusting capacitors in a conventional Colpitts oscillator, then the tuning range is extended, but the phase noise performance deteriorates and the feedback voltage may become negative

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning rangeVSAvoidphase noise performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The oscillator circuit is divided into two independent transistor pairs (first and second transistor pairs), each with its own inductor and capacitor. This segmentation allows each transistor pair to operate independently, maintaining stable phase noise characteristics while enabling extended tuning range through coordinated operation of both pairs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A resistor is introduced as an intermediary element connected to the second transistor of each transistor pair and to a ground point. This resistor serves as a mediator that stabilizes the feedback voltage, ensuring it remains positive throughout the tuning range, thereby preventing oscillation failure while allowing extended frequency tuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Use of energy by moving object

If the power supply voltage is reduced to lower power consumption, then energy efficiency is improved, but the minimum voltage requirement is constrained by transistor threshold voltages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidvoltage headroom
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The circuit transitions from a single-ended to a fully differential architecture, adding a second dimension to the signal path. This differential configuration allows the use of smaller transistor sizes with lower threshold voltages, enabling operation at reduced supply voltages while maintaining sufficient voltage headroom for reliable operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the operating parameters by using a fully differential topology that allows smaller transistor dimensions, which directly reduces the threshold voltage parameter. This parameter change enables the circuit to operate reliably at lower supply voltages, reducing power consumption while maintaining adequate voltage margins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Area of stationary object

If transistor size is reduced to decrease device area, then chip area is reduced, but the voltage swing requirements cannot be met without additional inductors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip areaVSAvoidinductor requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The differential output structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides the necessary voltage swing amplification, eliminates the need for additional inductors, and maintains compatibility with standard CMOS fabrication processes. This multi-functionality allows small transistor sizes without requiring extra inductive components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical/physical requirement for additional inductors with an electrical solution based on differential signaling. The differential output at the gate nodes of the feedback transistors generates the required voltage swings through capacitive division, substituting the need for additional inductive elements and reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed design achieves extended tuning range and maintains low phase noise performance, reduces power consumption, and protects transistors from large voltage swings, enabling efficient frequency tuning without compromising feedback voltage.

Implementation Method 1

a first inductor connected in a first line between a gate of the first transistor of the first transistor pair and a connecting point; a second inductor connected in a second line between a gate of the first transistor of the second transistor pair and the connecting point

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 2

a first variable capacitor connected in a third line between the first and second tap points

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS10819278B2Oscillator circuit
Publication Date: 2020.10.27 STICHTING IMEC NEDERLAND
  • US10819278B2 patent drawing
  • US10819278B2 patent drawing
  • US10819278B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A differential Colpitts oscillator circuit is described which has center-tapped inductors which are cross-coupled with gates of second transistors of first and second transistor pairs which can reduce the minimum power supply voltage and the bias voltage for the circuit. In addition, a capacitive ladder can be implemented which also has the potential benefit of increased tuning range.