Differential Driver Slew Rate Control for Lower EMI Noise

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Differential drivers face challenges in maintaining a stable slew rate due to variations in process voltage temperature (PVT) and maximum operating frequency, leading to increased electromagnetic interference (EMI) and noise in output signals, as well as limitations on maximum operating frequency caused by parasitic capacitances and resistances.

Innovation Solution

A differential driver design incorporating multiple pull-up resistors, differential-input transistor pairs, and a slew rate controller with delay circuits that generate differential input signals to adjust current flow through the transistors, allowing for simultaneous or sequential turn-on of transistors to control slew rates independently of PVT variations and maximum operating frequency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If transistors are turned on simultaneously to increase current flow, then the slew rate of the output signal increases, but electromagnetic interference and noise increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslew rateVSAvoidelectromagnetic interference and noise
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the transistor switching process by dividing the transistors into multiple groups that switch at different times. The slew rate controller generates control signals that cause different groups of transistors to turn on sequentially rather than simultaneously, thereby controlling the current flow rate and reducing EMI while maintaining the desired slew rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-generated harmful factors

If transistors are turned on sequentially to reduce current flow and lower slew rate, then EMI and noise are reduced, but the maximum operating frequency is limited by parasitic capacitances and resistances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectromagnetic interference and noiseVSAvoidmaximum operating frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic switching strategy where the slew rate controller adaptively adjusts the switching sequence and timing of transistor groups based on operating conditions. This dynamic control allows the system to optimize between reducing EMI and maintaining high operating frequency by flexibly managing the turn-on timing of different transistor groups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If a single current source is used with transistors having the same gate width, then the circuit structure is simplified, but the slew rate cannot be controlled independently of PVT variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit structureVSAvoidslew rate stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a slew rate controller as an intermediary component between the input signal and the transistor gates. This controller generates specialized control signals that override the direct input signal timing, thereby decoupling the slew rate from PVT variations. The controller acts as a mediator that shapes the switching behavior independently of process, voltage, and temperature effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Speed

If resistors with manufacturing error rates are used to delay transistor turn-on, then the slew rate can be adjusted, but PVT variations cause resistance changes that affect the delay timing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslew rate adjustmentVSAvoiddelay timing stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the passive resistor-based delay mechanism with an active control system. Instead of relying on fixed resistor values and RC time constants that are sensitive to PVT variations, the system uses an active slew rate controller that generates delay signals through active circuit elements. This substitution of passive mechanical/diffusive delay with active controlled delay eliminates the sensitivity to resistor manufacturing tolerances and PVT effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS7880521B2Differential driver and method capable of controlling slew rate
Publication Date: 2011.02.01 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US7880521B2 patent drawing
  • US7880521B2 patent drawing
  • US7880521B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A differential driver includes first and second pull-up resistors respectively connected to first and second output terminals, a plurality of differential-input transistor pairs connected each to the first and second output terminals, current sources connected each to the differential-input transistor pairs, and a slew rate controller adapted to generate differential input signals to be applied each to the differential-input transistor pairs in response to an input signal. The slew rate controller may output the differential input signals simultaneously or sequentially.