Differential-Hardness Threaded Fastener for Break-Resistant Flexing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional threaded fasteners used in vehicle beds often break under various directional forces, which is undesirable.

Innovation Solution

A threaded fastener design featuring a head and shaft with distinct threaded portions, where the tip portion has a higher hardness than the middle portion, achieved through heat treatment and case hardening, and optionally plated with zinc, to enhance strength and flexibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the entire fastener is made with high hardness material, then strength increases, but brittleness increases and flexibility decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The fastener applies different hardness levels to different portions: the tip portion (first threaded portion) is hardened to high hardness (58-65 HRC) for strength and thread engagement, while the shaft portion (second threaded portion) maintains lower hardness (25-35 HRC) for flexibility and shock absorption. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by providing high strength where needed while preserving overall flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The fastener is divided into distinct portions with different material properties: a tip portion subjected to heat treatment and case hardening for high hardness, and a shaft portion subjected only to heat treatment for moderate hardness. This segmentation allows each portion to have optimized properties for its specific function, resolving the strength-flexibility contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If the fastener uses uniform hardness throughout, then manufacturing is simpler, but the fastener breaks under directional forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidresistance to breaking
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different heat treatment processes to different portions of the fastener: the tip portion receives both heat treatment and case hardening, while the shaft portion receives only heat treatment. This local quality differentiation improves reliability under directional forces while maintaining reasonable manufacturing complexity through selective process application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material hardness parameter across different portions of the fastener by applying different heat treatment processes. The tip portion achieves 58-65 HRC hardness while the shaft portion achieves 25-35 HRC, creating a gradient that improves reliability without requiring complete redesign of the manufacturing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the tip portion is made harder than the shaft portion, then resistance to breaking increases, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to breakingVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is segmented into two stages: first, heat treatment of the entire fastener to achieve base hardness; second, selective case hardening of only the tip portion to achieve higher hardness. This segmentation of the manufacturing process achieves the reliability benefit while controlling complexity through process sequencing rather than requiring entirely different manufacturing approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fastener undergoes heat treatment as a preliminary action before case hardening. This preliminary heat treatment establishes a base hardness and prepares the material structure for subsequent case hardening, allowing the tip portion to be selectively hardened while the shaft portion retains the base hardness, thus managing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The fastener exhibits increased strength and resistance to breaking, allowing it to withstand forces that typically cause conventional fasteners to fail, while maintaining sufficient pliability to bend up to 30 degrees without breaking.

Implementation Method 1

The first portion and the second portion may be treated in a first hardening process, and only the first portion may be treated in a second hardening process. The first hardening process may be a heat treatment.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 2

The second hardness may be provided by a case hardening. Both the first portion and the second portion may be treated with the heat treatment, and only the first portion may be treated with the case hardening.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCase hardening: Case Hardening

Implementation Method 3

The fastener may be plated with, for example, zinc.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlating: Electroplating

Data Source

PatentUS20210293267A1Threaded fastener
Publication Date: 2021.09.23 ENGINEERED COMPONENTS COMPANY
  • US20210293267A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A fastener having a head and a shaft extending from a first end at the head to a second end forming a tip. The shaft has a first threaded portion and a second threaded portion. The first threaded portion is disposed at the tip. A hardness of the first portion is higher than a hardness of the second threaded portion.