Differential MEMS Sensor Amplifier Layout for Common-Mode Noise

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional MEMS microphone amplifier circuits face challenges in rejecting common-mode disturbances, managing power consumption, and reducing total harmonic distortion, particularly due to single-ended layouts and conflicting requirements between power consumption and distortion.

Innovation Solution

A fully differential circuit layout is implemented, featuring a capacitive microphonic sensor in a differential configuration with a feedback network of resistors and an additional amplifier stage to address common-mode noise and distortion, while maintaining low power consumption and output headroom.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single-ended layout is used in the amplifier circuit, then the device complexity is reduced, but the common-mode noise rejection capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit layout complexityVSAvoidcommon-mode noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The amplifier circuit is divided into two symmetrical amplifier stages (first and second amplifier stages) that process differential signals. Each stage handles one side of the differential pair, segmenting the signal path to enable common-mode rejection while maintaining manageable complexity through modular symmetry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a fully differential configuration where the two amplifier stages are symmetrically designed but process opposite-phase signals. This controlled asymmetry in signal polarity (one in-phase, one out-of-phase) enables common-mode noise cancellation while the symmetric hardware layout maintains design simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Use of energy by moving object

If power consumption is reduced in the amplifier circuit, then energy efficiency is improved, but total harmonic distortion increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidtotal harmonic distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A feedback network comprising first and second resistors is implemented to provide negative feedback from the output to the input stages. This feedback mechanism linearizes the amplifier operation, reducing total harmonic distortion while the efficient differential architecture maintains low power consumption through balanced signal paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The circuit utilizes parameter optimization in the amplifier stages and feedback network to achieve low distortion at reduced power levels. By carefully selecting operating points and component values (resistor ratios, capacitor values), the circuit maintains high linearity without requiring excessive power dissipation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a fully differential configuration is implemented, then common-mode noise rejection is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommon-mode noise rejectionVSAvoidcircuit layout complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fully differential configuration uses symmetric hardware layout with two matched amplifier stages, but introduces controlled signal asymmetry through differential signaling. This approach achieves common-mode rejection through the signal domain rather than requiring complex asymmetric circuit topologies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The differential configuration establishes equipotential virtual ground nodes at the inputs of both amplifier stages, creating balanced signal paths that naturally reject common-mode disturbances. This virtual ground technique simplifies the layout by providing stable reference points without requiring additional physical grounding complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

4Use of energy by moving object

If output headroom is maintained at low levels, then power consumption is reduced, but signal amplitude capability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidoutput signal amplitude
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback network parameters (resistor values and ratios) are optimized to provide sufficient gain while maintaining low output voltage levels. By adjusting the feedback factor and amplifier gain parameters, the circuit achieves adequate signal amplitude for downstream processing without requiring high power dissipation or large output headroom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The fully differential configuration effectively reduces common-mode noise and total harmonic distortion, enhancing the overall performance of the MEMS microphone amplifier circuit by providing improved signal rejection and distortion management.

Implementation Method 1

The microphone may include a variable capacitance with a fixed charge and a plate, called membrane, capable of bending when sound pressure is incident on the plate. In the presence of a charge, which is fixed, the variation in capacitance generates a voltage across the sensor.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance variation: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS10536122B2Amplifier circuit, corresponding system and device
Publication Date: 2020.01.14 STMICROELECTRONICS SRL
  • US10536122B2 patent drawing
  • US10536122B2 patent drawing
  • US10536122B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A circuit for amplifying signals from a Micro Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) capacitive sensor is provided. First and second input nodes receive a sensing signal applied differentially between the input nodes. A first amplifier stage and a second amplifier stage, respectively, produce a differential output signal between first and second output nodes. A common mode signal is detected at the output nodes. A voltage divider having an intermediate tap node is coupled between the first output node and the second output node. A feedback stage is coupled between the intermediate tap node of the voltage divider and the inputs of the first amplifier stage and the second amplifier stage, where the feedback line is sensitive to the common mode signal at the output nodes.