Folding Device with Differential-Area Pistons for Passive Contour Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural implements with folding devices require complex valve or pressure control systems to adapt to varying widths and comply with road traffic regulations, necessitating a simpler construction.

Innovation Solution

A folding device with at least two pistons having different surfaces, allowing one piston to move relative to the other due to a force acting on a frame part, enabling adaptation to ground contours without active control, and utilizing a pressure accumulator for fluidic exchange.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If complex valve or pressure control systems are used to adapt implement contours to agricultural areas, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontour adaptationVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The folding device enables self-service contour adaptation through a passive mechanism where frame parts automatically fold in response to ground contours without requiring active control signals. The system uses the natural interaction between the agricultural implement and the ground to trigger the folding action, eliminating the need for sensors, control units, or complex valve systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

A folding device acts as an intermediary mechanism between the frame parts and the ground interaction. It translates the force from ground contact into controlled folding motion through its mechanical structure, mediating the adaptation process without requiring electronic control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If folding mechanisms are added to adapt to road traffic requirements, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewidth adaptationVSAvoidfolding mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The folding function and contour adaptation function are merged into a single passive mechanical system. The same folding device that enables width adaptation for road traffic compliance also automatically adjusts frame contours when encountering uneven ground, eliminating the need for separate control systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The folding device performs multiple functions: it enables width adaptation for road transport compliance and simultaneously provides automatic contour adaptation during field operation. This multi-functionality is achieved through a simple passive mechanical design rather than multiple specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If passive folding mechanism is used without active control, then device complexity is reduced, but control precision worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidpositioning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The folding device creates a mechanical equilibrium system where frame parts naturally settle into stable positions determined by the balance of forces from ground contact and the folding mechanism's mechanical constraints. This passive equilibrium achieves sufficient positioning precision for agricultural operations without requiring active control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves positioning through changes in mechanical parameters such as folding angles and frame configurations rather than precise electronic control. The passive mechanism allows the system to transition between discrete stable states (folded/unfolded positions) that are sufficient for the application requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables contour adaptation of agricultural implements to uneven ground without complex control systems, ensuring compliance with road regulations and efficient operation.

Implementation Method 1

a pressure accumulator (13) is provided, which is designed to absorb a volume displaced by the movement of the piston relative to the other piston or to make the volume available

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

the pressure accumulator (13) is fluidically connected to the folding device (6)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic fluid displacement: Hydraulic Accumulator

Data Source

PatentEP4613084A1Folding device, agricultural working device with folding device and method for folding frame parts
Publication Date: 2025.09.10 HORSCH MASCHINEN SE & CO KG
  • EP4613084A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4613084A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~3B
  • EP4613084A1 patent drawingFigure 4A~4E

AI summary

Folding device (6) designed to fold two frame parts (3, 4, 5) toward each other. The invention is characterized in that the folding device (6) comprises at least two pistons (7, 8) having different surfaces (9, 10), wherein one piston (7, 8) is movable relative to the other piston (7, 8) by means of a force (F) acting on a frame part (3, 4, 5).