Differential Privacy Engine for Database Query Results

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing database systems fail to effectively ensure user privacy when aggregating and querying sensitive data, as they lack robust mechanisms to protect individual information while allowing for insights from large datasets.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of differential privacy techniques, which introduce statistical noise into aggregate user data, ensuring that information about specific users remains private by using a client-server architecture with a differential privacy engine, query transformer, budget manager, and noise generator to process and privatize query results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If differential privacy techniques are implemented to protect user privacy, then individual information privacy is improved, but query result accuracy deteriorates due to statistical noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser privacy protectionVSAvoidquery result accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the noise parameter (epsilon) based on query sensitivity and user-defined privacy preferences. By changing the noise magnitude parameter, the system can shift between stronger privacy protection (higher noise) and better query accuracy (lower noise), resolving the contradiction through parameter optimization rather than fixed trade-off

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The differential privacy mechanism is made adaptive through dynamic noise calibration. The system continuously adjusts noise levels based on query characteristics, data sensitivity, and privacy budget consumption, transforming a static privacy-accuracy trade-off into a dynamic optimization process that resolves the contradiction in context-specific manner

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If statistical noise is introduced into aggregate user data to ensure privacy, then privacy guarantees are improved, but data utility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy guaranteesVSAvoiddata utility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies differential privacy selectively rather than uniformly to all queries. By assessing query sensitivity and applying privacy mechanisms only when necessary (partial action), or adjusting noise levels to be just sufficient for privacy protection (avoiding excessive noise), the system maintains data utility while achieving privacy guarantees

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a privacy budget mechanism that provides feedback on privacy consumption. By monitoring cumulative noise injection across multiple queries and adjusting subsequent noise levels based on remaining budget, the system optimizes the balance between privacy guarantees and data utility over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If a comprehensive differential privacy system with multiple components is implemented, then privacy protection capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The differential privacy system is segmented into distinct functional modules: noise generator, query transformer, budget manager, and privacy policy enforcer. Each module handles a specific aspect of privacy protection, making the overall complex system manageable through clear separation of concerns while maintaining comprehensive privacy capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The query transformer serves as an intermediary component that bridges between raw queries and the differential privacy mechanism. It transforms queries into forms suitable for private evaluation, manages privacy budget allocation, and coordinates between different system components, reducing overall system complexity through centralized mediation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12079260B2Maintaining differential privacy for database query results
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 APPLE INC
  • US12079260B2 patent drawing
  • US12079260B2 patent drawing
  • US12079260B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The subject technology for maintaining differential privacy for database query results receives a query for a database that contains user data. The subject technology determines that the query is permitted for the database based at least in part on a privacy policy associated with the database. The subject technology determines that performing the query will not exceed a query budget for the database. The subject technology, when the query is permitted and performing the query will not exceed the query budget, performs the query on the database and receiving results from the query. The subject technology selects a differential privacy algorithm for the results based at least in part on a query type of the query. The subject technology applies the selected differential privacy algorithm to the results to generate differentially private results. The subject technology provides the differentially private results.