Differential Sign-Switching Circuitry Without Neutralization Capacitors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Designing a sign switching circuitry that addresses challenges such as power efficiency, voltage headroom, linearity, gain, and unwanted feedthrough between the input and output.

Innovation Solution

The sign switching circuitry comprises two differential common-source amplifiers with opposite gains, connected through a switching circuitry that activates one amplifier and deactivates the other to achieve sign switching, thereby neutralizing gate-to-drain capacitance without additional capacitors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single common-source amplifier is used for sign switching, then the circuit complexity is reduced, but the gate-to-drain capacitance causes gain loss and instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit complexityVSAvoidgain stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single amplifier is segmented into two identical common-source amplifiers operating in a push-pull configuration. Each amplifier handles one half of the signal cycle, with their outputs combined through differential signaling. This segmentation allows the gate-to-drain capacitance of one amplifier to be neutralized by the other, resolving the stability issue while maintaining manageable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses the gate-to-drain capacitance of one amplifier to counterbalance the capacitance of the other amplifier. By configuring the amplifiers in a differential push-pull arrangement, the capacitive effects cancel each other out, eliminating the need for additional neutralization components and improving gain stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

2Ease of operation

If passive switches are used for sign switching, then the switching function is achieved, but signal loss increases due to the switches being in the signal path

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching functionVSAvoidsignal loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces passive mechanical switches with an active electronic switching mechanism using two common-source amplifiers controlled in a push-pull manner. This substitution eliminates the need for switches to be directly in the signal path, as the amplifiers themselves perform the switching function through their controlled operation, thereby reducing signal loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If additional neutralization capacitors are added to compensate for gate-to-drain capacitance, then gain stability is improved, but the device complexity and parasitic effects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegain stabilityVSAvoidcircuit components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention makes the system self-service by using the inherent gate-to-drain capacitance of the amplifiers themselves to neutralize each other's capacitive effects. The two amplifiers in the push-pull configuration automatically compensate for capacitance without requiring external neutralization capacitors, thereby reducing component count and eliminating associated parasitic effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If the amplifiers are made asymmetric to optimize performance, then certain parameters are improved, but manufacturing precision and mismatch due to process variations worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance optimizationVSAvoidcomponent matching
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention initially considers asymmetric amplifier design for performance optimization but ultimately adopts a symmetric push-pull configuration. The symmetry ensures that both amplifiers have identical characteristics, which minimizes mismatch due to process variations and simplifies manufacturing while still achieving performance goals through the differential operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentEP3843098B1Sign switching circuitry
Publication Date: 2025.03.05 INTERUNIVERSITAIR MICRO ELECTRONICS CENT (IMEC VZW)
  • EP3843098B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1C
  • EP3843098B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3843098B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

Example embodiments describe a sign switching circuitry (100) comprising a first (191) and second (192) differential common-source amplifier having common differential input nodes (110, 121, 141, 111, 131, 151) and common differential output nodes (160, 123, 153, 161, 133, 143) configured such that a differential input signal applied at the common differential input nodes is amplified to a differential output signal at the common differential output nodes with a fixed gain by the first amplifier and by the fixed gain with opposite sign by the second amplifier; and a switching circuitry (170, 180) configured to activate the first common-source amplifier and deactivate the second common-source amplifier to amplify the differential input signal by the fixed gain, and to activate the second common-source amplifier and deactivate the first common-source amplifier to amplify the differential input signal by the fixed gain with opposite sign.