Differential Signal Switching with Propagation-Time Error Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing switching devices for converting differential input signals into ground-referenced output signals face challenges in detecting and correcting errors caused by level conversion and signal propagation time, leading to undefined output states and suboptimal error handling.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a switching device with multiple stages, including differential, evaluation, and bidirectional communication stages, which generate and compare ground-referenced signals with different propagation times to detect errors and deactivate the output signal accordingly, using optocouplers and logic gates for error detection and correction, ensuring a defined output state and time-optimized error handling with an unchanged number of interface signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If error detection and correction mechanisms are added to detect level conversion and signal propagation time errors, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection and correction capabilityVSAvoidnumber of stages and components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The switching device is divided into multiple functional stages: a first differential stage for signal conversion, a second differential stage for reference signal generation, an evaluation stage for error detection, and a bidirectional communications stage for error reporting. This segmentation allows each stage to perform a specific function, improving overall reliability through systematic error detection while organizing complexity into manageable modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second differential stage generates a reference ground-referenced signal in advance with a known, shorter propagation time. This preliminary action enables the evaluation stage to compare the reference signal with the actual output signal and detect errors before they affect system operation, improving reliability through proactive error detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If multiple differential stages with different propagation times are used for error detection, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal propagation time measurementVSAvoidnumber of differential stages
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The second differential stage creates a copy of the differential input signal conversion process with a controlled, shorter propagation time. This copied reference signal is then used by the evaluation stage to compare against the actual output, enabling precise measurement of propagation time errors without requiring complex measurement circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The invention intentionally creates a known difference in propagation time parameters between the first and second differential stages. The second stage is designed to have a significantly shorter propagation time, and this parameter difference is exploited by the evaluation stage to detect timing errors in the signal conversion process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If error states lead to output signal deactivation and indication on control signal, then reliability is improved, but loss of information occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror state handlingVSAvoidoutput signal deactivation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The bidirectional communications stage establishes a feedback loop between the evaluation stage and the control signal line. When the evaluation stage detects an error state, it sends an indication signal through the bidirectional communications stage to the control signal, which then triggers output signal deactivation. This feedback mechanism ensures reliable error handling while preserving information about the error state through the control signal interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures a defined output signal state and time-optimized error correction by detecting and reporting errors, providing galvanic separation and suppressing interference, while maintaining a cost-effective and space-efficient design.

Implementation Method 1

The switching device obtains the ground reference with the aid of an optocoupler

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical isolation: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11824531B2Switching device and system having the switching device for converting a differential input signal
Publication Date: 2023.11.21 SEW EURODRIVE GMBH & CO KG
  • US11824531B2 patent drawing
  • US11824531B2 patent drawing
  • US11824531B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a switching device and a system for converting a differential input signal into a ground-referenced output signal using a control signal, error states are detected, and detected error states lead to the deactivation of the ground-referenced output signal and are indicated on the control signal in addition.