Fully Differential Class AB Speaker Amplifier With Ripple Immunity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current audio amplifier designs face challenges such as noise propagation from power supplies, complex design requirements for intermediate stages, especially in class-G operation, and difficulty in protecting gates of low voltage PMOS devices, leading to inefficiencies and area constraints.

Innovation Solution

A fully differential amplifier topology operating in class AB mode with a differential drive intermediate stage, common mode regulation, and class AB regulation, using dual differentiation of input error signals and current sensing to regulate quiescent currents, allowing for area savings and improved immunity to supply ripple.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If rail-to-rail intermediate stage is used to drive high/low side power devices, then the amplifier can operate in class AB mode, but noise from power supplies propagates through Miller compensation capacitors degrading PSR

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower efficiencyVSAvoidnoise propagation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a dedicated intermediate stage that acts as a mediator between the power supply and output stage. This intermediate stage processes the error signal and drives the high/low side power devices without directly connecting the noisy power supply to the Miller compensation capacitors, thereby blocking noise propagation while maintaining class AB operation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If supply voltage varies widely as in class-G operation, then power efficiency improves, but it becomes much more difficult to keep the intermediate stage biased in linear mode requiring complex and larger design

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower efficiencyVSAvoidintermediate stage complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic biasing control for the intermediate stage that automatically adjusts the bias conditions based on the instantaneous supply voltage. This dynamic adaptation allows the intermediate stage to remain properly biased in linear mode across wide supply variations without requiring complex protective circuitry or larger design margins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of energy

If cascaded low voltage PMOS devices are used, then power efficiency improves, but it becomes much more complicated to protect their gates from seeing the full supply especially at start-up

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower efficiencyVSAvoidgate protection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary protection actions by implementing gate voltage clamping and protection circuitry that prevents the full supply voltage from appearing at the PMOS gate terminals during start-up and transient conditions. This preliminary protection is built into the circuit architecture, eliminating the need for complex external protection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Object-affected harmful factors

If fully differential amplifier topology is implemented, then immunity against supply ripple improves, but design complexity of intermediate stage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupply ripple immunityVSAvoidintermediate stage design
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the intermediate stage into distinct functional blocks: a differential error amplifier section and a differential drive section. This segmentation allows each block to be optimized independently for its specific function, simplifying the overall design while maintaining the supply ripple immunity benefits of the fully differential topology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8674765B2Fully differential amplifier topology to drive dynamic speakers in class AB mode
Publication Date: 2014.03.18 DIALOG SEMICON GMBH
  • US8674765B2 patent drawing
  • US8674765B2 patent drawing
  • US8674765B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Circuits and methods to achieve a new fully differential amplifier topology in class AB mode are disclosed. In a preferred embodiment of the disclosure the differential amplifier is diving dynamic speakers. An differential intermediate stage combines four different feedbacks, all sharing four high impedance nodes: main loop regulation feedback, common mode regulation feedback, and output stage quiescent current regulation for both differential output stage branches.