Differential Transimpedance Amplifier With Current Feedback Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional transimpedance amplifiers face limitations in achieving stable transimpedance over a wide frequency range, low input impedance, high common-mode rejection, low distortion, and low sensitivity to out-of-band interference, particularly in high-resolution audio systems, due to design complexities and limitations in single-ended differential configurations.

Innovation Solution

The proposed differential transimpedance amplifier employs a feedback network with passive or active components to minimize current differences between input signals, using current transfer systems, a current difference producing system, and a feedback network circuit to convert voltage differences into current signals, thereby reducing input impedance and enhancing signal quality without conventional voltage feedback circuits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional voltage feedback circuits are used in transimpedance amplifiers, then the amplifier can provide basic transimpedance function, but the design complexity increases and performance limitations arise in wide frequency range stability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestable transimpedanceVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback network that senses the output voltage and generates feedback currents proportional to the output signal. This feedback is applied to the differential input nodes to stabilize the transimpedance gain across a wide frequency range, resolving the contradiction between reliability and complexity by using a tailored feedback approach specific to current input amplifiers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The amplifier is divided into distinct functional blocks: current transfer systems for each input, a differential current generating stage, and a feedback network. This segmentation allows each block to be optimized independently, managing design complexity while achieving wideband stable transimpedance performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If conventional amplifier designs are used, then basic amplification is achieved, but input impedance remains high which limits performance in high-resolution audio systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidcircuit configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs an asymmetric circuit configuration where the feedback network is specifically tailored for current input amplifiers rather than using symmetric voltage feedback approaches. The feedback currents are differentially applied to balance the input nodes, achieving low input impedance characteristic essential for high-resolution audio applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The circuit transforms the input parameter from voltage-based feedback to current-based feedback, changing the fundamental operating parameters of the amplifier. This parameter change enables low input impedance operation while maintaining signal quality through current-mode signal processing throughout the signal path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If simple amplifier configurations are used, then device complexity is reduced, but common-mode rejection capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit structureVSAvoidcommon-mode rejection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback network generates differential feedback currents that are applied to the two input nodes to maintain them at equal potentials. This feedback mechanism actively suppresses common-mode signals by sensing output variations and counteracting their effect at the inputs, achieving high common-mode rejection without requiring complex differential stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If wide frequency range operation is implemented, then versatility is improved, but maintaining stable transimpedance becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency rangeVSAvoidtransimpedance stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback network continuously operates across the entire frequency spectrum to maintain transimpedance stability. The current feedback mechanism provides continuous correction of gain variations and phase shifts that occur with frequency changes, ensuring stable operation from DC through high frequencies without requiring multiple optimized stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

5Reliability

If conventional current transfer methods are used, then current amplification is achieved, but distortion increases and sensitivity to out-of-band interference improves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal fidelityVSAvoidcurrent control mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback network senses output voltage and generates corrective feedback currents that are injected into the differential input nodes. This feedback mechanism linearizes the current transfer process by counteracting non-linearities and distortion products, maintaining high signal fidelity while managing the complexity through a unified feedback approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11502654B2Single-ended differential transimpedance amplifier
Publication Date: 2022.11.15 HARMAN INT IND INC
  • US11502654B2 patent drawing
  • US11502654B2 patent drawing
  • US11502654B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In at least one embodiment, a differential amplifier including first and second current transfer systems, a current difference producing system, and a feedback network circuit is provided. The first current transfer system generates a first differential current signal. The second current transfer system generates a second differential current signal. The current difference producing system receives the first differential current signal and the second differential current signal and generates a voltage difference signal that is indicative of a difference between a first current signal and a second current signal. The feedback network circuit converts the voltage difference signal into at least two converted current signals and provides the at least two converted current signals to one of the first and second current transfer systems or the current difference producing system to minimize the difference between the first current signal and the second current signal.