Differing-Hardness Sole Structure for Terrain-Specific Cushioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sole structures in footwear lack the ability to adapt to various terrains and activities, providing inconsistent cushioning and traction due to uniform hardness and material composition.

Innovation Solution

A sole structure with distinct regions of varying hardness, each formed from different materials, including a first outer region with a Shore A durometer of 48-54, a second outer region with 64-70, and a third outer region with 85-91, allowing for differential engagement with the ground surface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a uniform hardness sole structure is used, then manufacturing is simple and consistent, but adaptability to diverse terrains and activities is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to diverse terrainsVSAvoidsole structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sole structure is divided into multiple distinct regions (first outer region, second outer region, third outer region) with different hardness values. Each region is positioned at specific distances from the longitudinal axis, creating a segmented architecture that provides different functional characteristics for various terrains and activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the sole are assigned different material properties (hardness values) to optimize performance for specific functions. The first outer region (48-54 Shore A) provides cushioning, the second outer region (64-70 Shore A) provides intermediate support, and the third outer region (85-91 Shore A) provides durability and traction, allowing each local area to be optimized for its specific role.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If different materials with varying hardness are used in different regions, then adaptability and cushioning are improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetailored cushioning and tractionVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is segmented into distinct steps for forming each region with its specific material composition. The first outer region, second outer region, and third outer region are formed separately with their respective hardness values, allowing for controlled material placement and curing processes that manage manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sole structure utilizes composite materials with different hardness values in different regions. By combining materials with varying Shore A durometer ratings (48-54, 64-70, and 85-91) in a single sole structure, the invention achieves tailored performance characteristics while managing manufacturing through established composite material formation techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If a single material composition is used, then manufacturing is straightforward, but cushioning and traction performance is inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecushioning consistencyVSAvoidmaterial composition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sole structure implements local quality by assigning specific material compositions to specific regions. The first outer region uses material with 48-54 Shore A hardness for superior cushioning, the second outer region uses 64-70 Shore A material for balanced support, and the third outer region uses 85-91 Shore A material for durability and traction, ensuring each area performs reliably for its intended function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the physical parameter of hardness (Shore A durometer) across different regions of the sole. By systematically varying this parameter from 48-54 in the first outer region to 64-70 in the second outer region and 85-91 in the third outer region, the sole achieves consistent and reliable performance across different terrains and activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12357056B2Sole structure having differing hardness regions
Publication Date: 2025.07.15 NIKE INC
  • US12357056B2 patent drawing
  • US12357056B2 patent drawing
  • US12357056B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sole structure of an article of footwear includes a first outer region, a second outer region, and a third outer region. The first outer region is at least partially disposed a first distance from a longitudinal axis and includes a first hardness. The second outer region is at least partially disposed a second distance from the longitudinal axis and includes a second hardness that is greater than the first hardness. The third outer region is at least partially disposed between the first outer region and the second outer region a third distance from the longitudinal axis and includes a third hardness that is greater than the first hardness and less than the second hardness. The second distance is greater than the first distance, and the third distance is greater than the first distance and less than the second distance.