Diffraction Grating Input Waveguide Placement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Diffraction gratings in optical systems face challenges such as channel crosstalk, phase errors, and optical losses due to imperfections in the grating material and design, particularly in the spacing between input and output channels, and the quality of reflective facets.

Innovation Solution

The optical system employs a planar waveguide and a diffraction grating, with the input waveguide positioned between output waveguides on a Rowland circle, utilizing a set of grating facets to reflect light into separate wavelength bands with equal optical losses, and tuning the width, height, and blaze angle of the facets to reduce fluctuations and device size.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the diffraction grating uses standard spacing between input and output channels, then the optical component can be manufactured with conventional dimensions, but channel crosstalk increases and wavelength separation precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewavelength separation precisionVSAvoidchannel crosstalk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the spacing between input and output channels from standard dimensions to optimized dimensions. Specifically, the distance between the input waveguide and output waveguides is adjusted to specific values (e.g., 50-150 μm) to achieve optimal wavelength separation and minimize channel crosstalk. This parameter optimization enables precise wavelength multiplexing while maintaining manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the diffraction grating uses larger facet dimensions, then manufacturing precision can be improved, but the device footprint increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefacet qualityVSAvoiddevice footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes facet dimensions by changing parameters such as facet width (1-10 μm), height (1-20 μm), and spacing (10-50 μm) to achieve a balance between manufacturing precision and device footprint. These optimized dimensions enable high-quality reflective facets that minimize optical losses while maintaining a compact device size suitable for integrated photonics applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If the diffraction grating uses conventional blaze angle, then diffraction efficiency is maintained, but optical losses increase due to facet imperfections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical lossesVSAvoiddiffraction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the blaze angle parameter to minimize optical losses while maintaining high diffraction efficiency. The blaze angle is adjusted based on the operating wavelength and grating geometry to maximize constructive interference in the desired diffraction order. This parameter optimization compensates for facet imperfections and reduces scattering losses, improving overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-affected harmful factors

If the optical component uses larger spacing between waveguides, then channel crosstalk is reduced, but the device complexity and size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel crosstalkVSAvoidcomponent size
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces device complexity by optimizing the spacing parameter between waveguides to the minimum value required to achieve acceptable crosstalk levels. By precisely controlling the distance between input and output waveguides (50-150 μm), the design achieves effective channel isolation without requiring excessive spacing that would increase device size and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces channel crosstalk and optical losses, enhances diffraction efficiency, and allows for a smaller footprint while maintaining balanced optical performance across different wavelength bands.

Implementation Method 1

An input waveguide may provide the light through a planar waveguide and reflect off of a diffraction grating, as a first output light received by a first output waveguide and a second output light received by a second output waveguide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffraction: Diffraction

Implementation Method 2

The set of grating facets may reflect a first wavelength range of light at a first angle and to the first output waveguide and may reflect a second wavelength range of light at a second angle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

An Echelle grating is one type of diffraction grating where the input light travels through a medium and multi-path interference of light can cause the wavelengths of the reflected light to combine or separate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterference: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS11506535B1Diffraction grating design
Publication Date: 2022.11.22 APPLE INC
  • US11506535B1 patent drawing
  • US11506535B1 patent drawing
  • US11506535B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Configurations for a diffraction grating design and methods thereof are disclosed. The diffraction grating system can include an input waveguide located at a first location on or near a Rowland circle and multiple output waveguides located at a second and third location on or near the Rowland circle. The input waveguide may be located between the output waveguides and this configuration of input and output waveguides can reduce the footprint size of the device. In some examples, the optical component can function as a de-multiplexer. Additionally, the optical component may separate the input wavelength band into two output wavelength bands which are separated from one another by approximately 0.1 μm.