Diffractive Optical Element Calibration for Free-Form Surface Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current interferometric measurement techniques for free-form surfaces, such as those in microlithographic optical elements, face challenges in achieving high accuracy due to insufficient calibration of diffractive optical elements, particularly for non-rotationally symmetric surfaces, where manufacturing errors affect the measurement precision.

Innovation Solution

A measurement apparatus and method utilizing a multiply-encoded diffractive optical element that produces a test wave with a free-form surface wavefront and a calibration wave with a non-rotationally symmetric wavefront, allowing for improved calibration accuracy by minimizing the difference between the test and calibration wavefronts, thereby predicting and mitigating manufacturing errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a conventional diffractive optical element is used for measuring free-form surfaces, then the measurement can be performed, but the measurement precision is insufficient due to manufacturing errors in the CGH

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape measurement accuracyVSAvoidCGH fabrication accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing calibration measurements before actual shape measurements. The CGH is calibrated by measuring a calibration object with known geometry, and the measured CGH errors are stored for subsequent correction during actual measurements, thereby compensating for manufacturing errors in advance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using the measured CGH errors from calibration objects to correct the CGH data before performing actual shape measurements. The system continuously refines the CGH accuracy by comparing measured data with known reference geometries and applying corrections to subsequent measurements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If the CGH is calibrated using rotationally symmetric calibration objects, then calibration is simplified, but calibration accuracy for free-form surfaces is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration object simplicityVSAvoidfree-form surface calibration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by introducing calibration objects with non-rotationally symmetric geometries that match the free-form nature of the surfaces to be measured. This allows the calibration process to capture and correct for the specific error patterns that affect free-form surface measurements, rather than assuming rotational symmetry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Measurement precision

If multiple calibration objects are used to calibrate the CGH, then calibration accuracy improves, but the measurement process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCGH calibration accuracyVSAvoidcalibration process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the calibration process into multiple independent calibration objects, each targeting specific error patterns. By segmenting the calibration into manageable parts with different geometric characteristics, the system can systematically correct different types of CGH errors while maintaining organizational control over the complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the precision of shape measurement for free-form surfaces by accurately accounting for manufacturing errors in the diffractive optical element, leading to improved calibration and reduced root mean square deviation of the actual shape from the desired shape in microlithographic exposure apparatuses.

Implementation Method 1

a diffractive optical element, which is configured to produce by diffraction from the input wave a test wave

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffraction: Diffraction

Implementation Method 2

the accuracy of the shape measurement depends on the accuracy of the CGH... deviations from the desired shape can be determined by the superposition of a reference wave on the reflected test wave

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterference: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS11892283B2Measuring apparatus for interferometrically determining a surface shape
Publication Date: 2024.02.06 CARL ZEISS SMT GMBH
  • US11892283B2 patent drawing
  • US11892283B2 patent drawing
  • US11892283B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A measurement apparatus (10) for interferometrically determining a surface shape of a test object (14). A radiation source provides an input wave (42), a multiply-encoded diffractive optical element (60), which is configured to produce by diffraction from the input wave a test wave (66) that is directed at the test object and has a wavefront in the form of a free-form surface and at least one calibration wave (70), and a capture device (46). The calibration wave has a wavefront with a non-rotationally symmetric shape (68f), wherein cross sections through the wavefront of the calibration wave along cross-sectional surfaces each aligned transversely to one another have a curved shape. The curved shapes in the different cross-sectional surfaces differ in terms of an opening parameter. The capture device (46) captures a calibration interferogram formed by superimposing a reference wave (40) with the calibration wave after interaction with a calibration object (74).