Diffractive Optical Element Sintering Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machining methods for diffractive optical elements, particularly those using cutting tools with hard materials like ceramic, suffer from tool abrasion issues, leading to reduced precision and increased manufacturing costs, while sintering and compression molding do not adequately enhance optical characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A diffractive optical element with surface roughness of 0.05 μm or less and a sintered ceramic body where prominent and groove portions have radii of curvature larger than half the average grain size, along with a die configuration that facilitates precise molding and reduces tool wear, enhancing machining precision and optical characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a cutting tool is used to machine a ceramic diffractive optical element, then the optical characteristics can be improved through precise machining, but the cutting tool becomes progressively abraded, reducing production efficiency and increasing manufacturing cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining precisionVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical cutting system with a sintering and compression molding system. Instead of using cutting tools to remove material, the diffractive optical element is formed by sintering ceramic powder in a mold that directly creates the desired surface structure with prominent portions and groove portions. This eliminates tool abrasion while achieving the required surface roughness of Ra ≤ 0.05 μm

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material state from solid ceramic requiring mechanical cutting to ceramic powder that can be sintered and molded. By controlling the sintering temperature, pressure, and mold design (with radius of curvature ≥ half the grain size), the process achieves precise surface geometry without mechanical tool wear

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a diamond tool is used as the cutting tool, then the progress of abrasion is suppressed to a certain degree, but the manufacturing cost increases and the improvement to machining precision is not necessarily adequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool durabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the need for diamond cutting tools by replacing the mechanical cutting process with sintering and compression molding. The mold itself, made from durable material, directly forms the diffractive structure through heat and pressure, achieving Ra ≤ 0.05 μm surface finish without any tool abrasion issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The process transitions from mechanical removal (cutting) to thermal-forming (sintering). By controlling sintering temperature and pressure parameters, the ceramic powder is consolidated into the final shape with precise surface geometry, eliminating the need for expensive diamond tools while maintaining or improving precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If sintering and compression molding are used to manufacture a ceramic diffractive optical element, then the problem of cutting tool abrasion is significantly reduced, but adequate machining precision is not necessarily obtained and optical characteristics are not adequately enhanced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidsurface roughness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality control by designing the mold with specific geometric parameters (radius of curvature at least half the grain size) that directly transfer to the diffractive element surface. The mold's surface characteristics in the optical effective area are optimized to produce Ra ≤ 0.05 μm, while other areas of the element can have different properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The precise surface geometry is created during the sintering and compression molding process itself, before any subsequent machining. The mold pre-forms the prominent portions and groove portions with the required precision, eliminating the need for post-sintering machining and ensuring the surface roughness requirement is met from the start

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves enhanced optical characteristics and reduced manufacturing costs by improving machining precision and extending die durability, while maintaining low production costs.

Implementation Method 1

Diffractive optical elements (DOE) for focusing light and performing other functions by utilizing a light diffraction phenomenon to change the direction in which light is propagated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight diffraction: Diffraction

Data Source

PatentUS8294996B2Diffractive optical element and method of manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2012.10.23 SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES LTD
  • US8294996B2 patent drawing
  • US8294996B2 patent drawing
  • US8294996B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A diffractive optical element (1) composed of a ceramic, in which the optical characteristics are enhanced by enhancing the machining precision, is composed of an infrared-transmissive ceramic, and prominent portions (11) and groove portions (12) are repeatedly formed on a surface of the diffractive optical element (1). The average value of the surface roughness Ra within an optical effective area (10) of the surface of the diffractive optical element is 0.05 μm or less, and the difference in the surface roughness Ra within the optical effective area (10) of the surface is 0.02 μm or less.