X-ray Diffractometer Direct Drive Goniometer Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

X-ray diffractometers with Bragg-Brentano geometry in theta-theta configuration face challenges due to complex structures with numerous components, leading to difficult assembly, maintenance issues, friction, wear, and reduced precision and repeatability of results.

Innovation Solution

A simplified X-ray diffractometer design with a reduced number of components, utilizing a tubular supporting body with annular bearings and direct drive servo motors for independent rotation of the emitter and detector units, eliminating kinematic transmission mechanisms and mechanical clearances, and incorporating precision encoders for accurate angular measurement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional kinematic transmission mechanisms (worm screw, toothed wheel) are used to rotate emitter and detector units, then the diffractometer can achieve the required rotational movement, but the device complexity increases and manufacturing precision deteriorates due to multiple components and mechanical clearances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational movement capabilityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the intermediate kinematic transmission mechanisms (worm screw, toothed wheel) from the system, directly coupling the motors to the goniometric axes. This extraction of unnecessary components simplifies the structure while maintaining the essential rotational functionality, directly resolving the contradiction between operational capability and device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical transmission systems with direct drive motor systems. Instead of using mechanical advantage through gears and screws, the system uses direct electromagnetic drive, eliminating mechanical clearances and reducing the number of moving parts, thus reducing device complexity while preserving rotational movement capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If traditional kinematic transmission mechanisms are used, then rotational adjustment is possible, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to friction, wear, and mechanical clearances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment capabilityVSAvoidpositioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By removing the intermediate transmission elements (worm screw, toothed wheel, bearings), the patent eliminates the sources of friction, wear, and mechanical clearances. The direct coupling between motors and goniometric axes ensures that positioning accuracy is determined only by motor control and encoder precision, not by mechanical transmission errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes mechanical transmission systems with direct electromagnetic drive systems. This replacement eliminates the cumulative errors from multiple mechanical interfaces, ensuring that positioning accuracy depends on electronic control precision and encoder resolution rather than mechanical manufacturing tolerances and wear

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If multiple kinematic transmission mechanisms are used, then rotational movement can be achieved, but reliability decreases due to increased likelihood of failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational functionalityVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes all intermediate transmission mechanisms from the rotational drive system. By eliminating worm screws, toothed wheels, and multiple bearings, the system reduces the number of potential failure points. The direct drive architecture ensures that rotational functionality is maintained while significantly improving reliability through component reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If traditional moving mechanisms with multiple components are used, then the emitter and detector units can be rotated, but the overall dimensions of the diffractometer increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunit rotation capabilityVSAvoidoverall device dimensions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the bulky intermediate transmission mechanisms (worm screw assemblies, toothed wheel housings, multiple bearing supports) that traditionally increased the physical footprint of diffractometers. The direct drive system allows for more compact motor-goniometric axis integration, reducing the overall dimensions while maintaining rotation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the motor assembly directly with the goniometric axis structure, eliminating separate transmission housings and intermediate mechanical components. This integration consolidates the rotational drive system into a more compact configuration, reducing the overall device dimensions while preserving the ability to rotate emitter and detector units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves greater structural rigidity, accuracy, and repeatability of component movements, reducing friction and wear, making the device easier to assemble and maintain, while allowing analysis of larger samples with lower construction and maintenance costs.

Implementation Method 1

The encoder is an integral part of the bearing and allows for the measurement of the position of the rotor with respect to the stator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEncoder measurement:

Implementation Method 2

X-ray diffractometry is an established experimental technique that allows the investigation of the structure and microstructure of materials. This technique is based on the irradiation, with a beam of X-rays generated by an emitter unit, of a sample from which the beam is diffracted and captured by a detector unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray diffraction: Bragg Diffraction

Data Source

PatentEP2598863B1Improved x-ray diffractometer and method of installing said improved x-ray diffractometer.
Publication Date: 2014.10.22 TNX
  • EP2598863B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2598863B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2598863B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention concerns an X-ray diffractometer (1) having Bragg-Brentano geometry in the theta-theta configuration for the crystallographic characterization of samples (C) of solid materials, powders and/or liquid samples subjected to analysis, which includes: a tubular supporting body (4) which is associated with a flange (8) provided with a circular through hole (9) and defined by two opposing walls (10, 11) to which a first and a second annular bearings (12, 13) are respectively associated; two tubular shafts (14, 15), each of which is supported during its rotation by the two annular bearings (12, 13), one of the tubular shafts (14) being arranged so that it passes through the flange (8) and is internally coaxial with the second tubular shaft (15) so that they both have their free end (141, 151) protruding from the same side of the supporting body (4); two direct drive servo operated motors (16, 17), annular in shape, each of which is suited to set one of the two tubular shafts (14, 15) rotating around the common axis (x); an X-ray emitter unit (2) and a unit (3) suited to detect the X-rays diffracted from the sample (C), each of which is associated with one of the free ends (141, 151) of the tubular shafts (14, 15), in such a way as to define the goniometric axis theta1 and the goniometric axis theta2 of the diffractometer (1) that are coaxial to each other and rotate independently.