Diffusion MRI Iron Quantification via Bipolar Gradient Sequences

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for quantifying iron deposits in tissues using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) face challenges such as non-specificity, invasiveness, and impracticality in clinical settings, particularly in accurately measuring iron content in specific tissues without causing signal artifacts that affect diffusion measurements.

Innovation Solution

The method employs a combination of mono-polar and bipolar gradient sequences in diffusion-weighted MRI to accurately quantify iron deposits by comparing apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) from both sequences, allowing for the calculation of an iron-induced local gradient factor that correlates with iron concentration, enabling precise and non-invasive iron content assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If phase shift or T2* approaches are used to evaluate iron load, then iron quantification can be obtained, but the method suffers from non-specificity as iron induced BMS effects are not the unique source of signal phase shifts and R2* changes in tissues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveiron quantification accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement specificity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the measurement process into two distinct components by using two different diffusion encoding schemes (monopolar and bipolar). Each scheme responds differently to iron-induced field gradients, allowing the iron effect to be isolated and quantified separately from other tissue properties through comparative analysis of the two measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of gradient polarity (monopolar vs bipolar) to create two different measurement conditions. This parameter change allows differentiation between iron-induced effects and other tissue properties, as the bipolar sequence is specifically designed to be insensitive to static field gradients while the monopolar sequence remains sensitive to them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If monopolar diffusion gradient sequence is used, then diffusion MRI can be acquired, but iron induced BMS effects produce cross-terms with programmed gradient pulses resulting in underestimation of ADC

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediffusion MRI acquisitionVSAvoidADC accuracy in presence of iron
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful artifact (ADC underestimation due to iron-induced cross-terms in monopolar sequence) into a beneficial diagnostic signal. By comparing the ADC values from monopolar and bipolar sequences, the discrepancy itself becomes a quantitative measure of iron content, transforming a measurement error into a useful clinical parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If bipolar diffusion gradient sequence is used, then ADC measurement is immune to local magnetic field gradients, but the sequence complexity increases compared to monopolar sequence

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveADC measurement reliabilityVSAvoidgradient sequence complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the bipolar gradient sequence serve multiple functions: it provides accurate ADC measurement in the presence of iron (by being immune to field gradients) and simultaneously serves as a reference measurement for quantifying iron content through comparison with the monopolar sequence, eliminating the need for separate iron-specific imaging protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides high-accuracy, non-invasive quantification of iron deposits in tissues, overcoming signal artifacts and enabling reliable iron content measurement, particularly in the brain, which can aid in diagnosing neurodegenerative disorders like Parkinson's disease.

Implementation Method 1

Iron deposits get transiently magnetized (paramagnetic magnetization) in the magnetic field of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanners and are responsible for local changes in Bulk Magnetic Susceptibility (BMS)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectParamagnetic magnetization: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

In the context of diffusion MRI such local gradients produce non-negligible cross-terms with the programmed gradient pulses inserted for diffusion encoding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field gradient: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentEP3155442B1MRI method to quantify iron amount in tissues using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
Publication Date: 2021.08.04 COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES
  • EP3155442B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3155442B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~4E
  • EP3155442B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A method to quantify and map iron deposits in the brain with diffusion- weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is based on the differential sensitivity of mono-polar (MPG) gradient pulse diffusion sequences and bipolar (BPG) sequences on the local magnetic field gradients induced by iron deposits and their cross-term with the diffusion-encoding gradients. The method comprises the steps of acquiring (12, 14) first MRI images and second MRI of a Region Of Interest by using MPG and BPG sequences, providing (16) an attenuation model of the diffusion MRI attenuated signal representative of the observed tissue, estimating (18, 20) a first apparent diffusion coefficient ADCMPG and a second apparent diffusion coefficient ADCBPG by fitting the MRI images with the attenuation model, calculating (22) a an iron induced local gradient factor ξ Fe as (Formula I) (I), and determining (24) the concentration [Fe] and/or the amount of iron stored in the local zone of the tissue from the calculated iron induced local gradient factor ξ Fe . An apparatus is configured for implementing such a method.