Continuous Digester Optimization via Soft Sensor and MPC

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Continuous digester processes face challenges in maintaining stable Kappa number and chip level due to nonlinear dynamics and long measurement delays, leading to inconsistent pulp quality and inefficient control methods that are costly and difficult to implement.

Innovation Solution

A system employing a tracking module for transforming process variables into non-linear empirical models, a soft sensor for generating real-time quality measurements, and a constraint management module with a model predictive controller to optimize digester operation by adjusting set points within dynamically generated constraints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If physics-based model-based control methods are used to maintain Kappa number, then control accuracy is improved, but device complexity and implementation cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveKappa number control accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive, complex physics-based models with simpler, computationally lightweight empirical models that are easier to implement and maintain. These simplified models achieve adequate control accuracy without requiring high-level expertise for calibration and tuning, making them practically feasible for average process engineers while reducing implementation and maintenance costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the complex physics-based model into a simplified empirical model by changing the mathematical parameters and relationships. The empirical model uses straightforward mathematical relationships between measurable process variables and Kappa number, avoiding the complex nonlinear differential equations of physics-based models while maintaining sufficient control accuracy for practical applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If kappa feedback control is used to correct Kappa number variations, then quality consistency is improved, but response speed deteriorates due to long time delay

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveKappa number consistencyVSAvoidcontrol response speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by using the simplified empirical model to predict Kappa number trends and initiate control adjustments before the full effect of disturbances is observed. The model-based predictive control calculates future Kappa values based on current process conditions and anticipated changes, allowing the system to proactively adjust cooking parameters to prevent quality deviations rather than reactively correcting them after delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enhances the feedback mechanism by continuously comparing predicted Kappa values from the empirical model with actual measurements and using this information to dynamically adjust control parameters. The feedback loop operates more effectively because the simplified model provides timely predictions without the computational burden of complex physics-based models, enabling faster corrective actions while maintaining quality consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If chip level is varied to address pulp quality issues, then adaptability is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to non-optimal operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to level variationsVSAvoidcooking consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes by dynamically adjusting cooking parameters (such as cooking time, temperature, or chemical dosage) in response to chip level variations rather than varying the chip level itself. The simplified empirical model predicts how different cooking parameters will affect Kappa number under varying chip levels, enabling the system to maintain optimal cooking conditions and pulp quality consistency even when chip level fluctuates, thereby preserving manufacturing precision while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10344429B2Systems and methods for advanced optimization of continuous digester operation
Publication Date: 2019.07.09 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • US10344429B2 patent drawing
  • US10344429B2 patent drawing
  • US10344429B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for optimization of a continuous digester operation of a continuous digester are presented. The system includes a tracking module for tracking of process variables in the continuous digester operation and developing non-linear empirical model for one or more quality variables. A soft sensor module is used for deploying a soft sensor based on the non-linear empirical model and for generating soft measurements corresponding to the quality variables at different locations. A constraint management module is used for generating dynamically a set of constraints that are used by a model predictive controller for computing set points for optimization of continuous digester operation.